Hey show biz folks! Females can host science TV shows too...

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This morning I came across a few casting notices for some interesting sounding TV shows. These projects are both in development with Asylum Entertainment, a well-established production company with a solid reputation for producing programs that have aired on a number of networks including Animal Planet, TLC, A&E, History Channel and ESPN (just to name a few). One of their latest projects, ‘The Kennedys’ with Katie Holmes and Greg Kinnear, was a massive hit this past spring which garnered international acclaim.

It is fantastic to see that such solid production companies are hard at work developing content with scientific merit – something that television generally lacks and very much requires. What’s NOT fantastic however; are their descriptions of their ideal hosting candidates:

Show #1: Monster Machinery


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


This show is looking for two engineer-type hosts that aren’t afraid to re-work the mechanics of various machines/vehicles/appliances for entertaining purposes. Host #1 should have a ‘larger than life’ personality, while host #2 should have a very strong personality and be more serious than host #1. They describe their ideal host #1 as “Mike Rowe meets Mythbusters”, and they specify that BOTH should be males between the ages of 25 and 45.

Show #2: Insects (title TBD)

This show seeks a host with a passion for (and solid scientific background in) entomology. In this show our heroic bug-loving host will travel the globe looking for all kinds of crazy insects from the highly poisonous and deadly to the harmless yet menacing. Again, they describe their ideal host as male aged 25 – 45, having a ‘larger than life’ personality, with a description of “Anthony Bourdain traveling the globe seeking out bugs’.

Now, the whole Mike Rowe/Anthony Bourdain angle is obviously something that works – I’ve seen a number of casting notices of similar description, looking for exactly these same kinds of characters for shows in various genres. I get it. Both of these fellas are entertaining hosts and do a great job on their own shows - BUT (and this is a great big BUT) there’s NO REASON to rule out the possibility that a female host could not be just as convincing and charismatic in this kind of role. I’m certain that there are many extremely captivating female engineers and entomologists that could rock these positions – in fact I know many of them personally.

So ladies here’s my advice: let’s make a run at these castings and make a statement about just WHO would be fantastic in a role like this. They may think that a Mike Rowe/Anthony Bourdain is what they are looking for – but they haven’t seen the likes of YOU yet. To contact the casting director for either of these productions send an email to: thetvcastingdirector@gmail.com

 

Carin Bondar is a biologist, writer and film-maker with a PhD in population ecology from the University of British Columbia. Find Dr. Bondar online at www.carinbondar.com, on twitter @drbondar or on her facebook page: Dr. Carin Bondar – Biologist With a Twist.

More by Carin Bondar

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe