May 25, 2012

Top Video Picks from the #SciFund Challenge

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

The second round of the SciFund Challenge is soon coming to a close - and many projects have been successful in achieving their fundraising goals. Over $75,000 has already been raised, making it clear that crowdfunding for science is a sound strategy for the future of research. How can you ensure a successful campaign? You can start by creating a video production that is unique, entertaining and clear about your objectives. By the looks of it, potential donors are looking at the presentation just as much as the idea. Projects without a great video are simply not getting as much love. Here are my favorites for this round, and remember, you still have a few days left to support your favorites! Campaigns end on May 31!

Best video goes to Greg Goldsmith for 'Watching Clouds in the Cloud Forest'.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Honorable mentions go to:

Aiden Arnold, for 'Helping Children Stay Oriented Through Life'

Aaron Berdanier, for 'Healthy Trees, Diverse Forests'

Catherine Anderson, for 'Budding Scientists'

and a very special mention to my friend Zen Faulkes, who created a second video to go along with his campaign. I love his ideas and his main video for 'Beach of the Goliath Crabs', but the humor and simple message in the second video make it a pleasure to watch. (NB: Zen's project is already fully funded - so I'm not calling him out to get him any more cash, just watch the videos!)

Well done to my favorites, and best wishes to all projects in the SciFund Challenge!

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American