In Praise of Chicago’s Hypotenuses

Walking the Pythagorean theorem

A 1913 map of Chicago showing some of the "L" lines

A map of Chicago showing some of the diagonal streets.

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


My neighborhood isn’t exactly sleepy, but the traffic isn't too bad. Sometimes I can even cross intersections diagonally while I take a walk. On one recent walk, I started wondering how much distance I save myself with my little hypotenuse trick, so when I got home I measured our intersection. Blocks in my neighborhood are approximately 400 feet long, and streets are approximately 40 feet wide.

Based on those numbers, I used the Pythagorean theorem to figure out that I would walk about 460 feet if I walked along a block and cross an intersection on the diagonal or 480 feet if I crossed both streets separately, a savings of about 5% of the distance. It’s not terrible, but it’s not a lot either. Stopping to pet just one cat would probably wipe out any time savings on an average walk. (Worth it!)

In contrast, behold Chicago! In May, I stayed just off of Milwaukee Avenue during a visit to Chicago. Milwaukee runs from the west part of downtown Chicago almost all the way up to the Wisconsin border. It changes its precise compass bearing a few times during the trip, but it starts out at almost exactly a 45 degree angle, the perfect hypotenuse to the rest of Chicago’s street grid.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The event I was attending was northwest of my hotel, and I almost wept at the beautiful efficiency as I walked along Milwaukee. The unconventional six-way and mid-block intersections are a small price to pay for the pleasure of walking along a glorious hypotenuse. The city’s most-used bike lane is along Milwaukee. A cyclist can ride from their Logan Square abode through the chocolatey air of River West and to downtown in only 70% of the time it would take on the rectilinear streets of the grid.

Milwaukee has been an important road for Chicago since before white settlers established the city we now know by that name. It was used by Native Americans long before their land was taken by the American government, as this article about the avenue describes.

Milwaukee is not the only hypotenuse in Chicago. The city is lousy with them. Grand, Clybourn, Lincoln, Ogden, and several other streets cut jaunty angles across the city, disrupting the tidiness of the grid and saving pedestrians and cyclists a few steps or twirls of the pedals. The next time you're in Chicago, after you've enjoyed the fantastic food, striking architecture, and beautiful lake, a long walk might help you appreciate the city's hypotenuses.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe