Really Big Numbers (Book Review)

"Now and then we pluck numbers from the blur...numbers which have no names except the ones we might now give them...souvenirs from alien, unknowable worlds." -Really Big Numbers by Richard Evan Schwartz Really Big Numbers by Richard Schwartz, a mathematician at Brown University, is the first children’s book published by the American Mathematical Society.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Really Big Numbers by Richard Schwartz will be published by the American Mathematical Society on July 3, 2014.

“Now and then we pluck numbers from the blur…numbers which have no names except the ones we might now give them…souvenirs from alien, unknowable worlds.”

-Really Big Numbers by Richard Evan Schwartz

Really Big Numbers by Richard Schwartz, a mathematician at Brown University, is the first children's book published by the American Mathematical Society. (Disclosure: I am an editor of the American Mathematical Society Blog on Math Blogs.) But this is not Schwartz's first foray into talking about math with kids. He has two daughters, and in 2010, he wrote You Can Count on Monsters, which uses illustrations of strange and spiky beasts to explore the properties of numbers from 1 to 100.

Really Big Numbers is more. In it, Schwartz moves from counting by ones to counting by tens and thousands, to ever more abstract ways of representing quantities too huge for human comprehension. The book was inspired by the fact that when children find out that Schwartz is a mathematician, they often ask him about big numbers. It would be easy for a professional mathematician to dismiss questions like that; after all, what is more mechanical than big numbers? Name one, and I’ll tell you a bigger one. But Schwartz does not see the request as trivial. Sometimes the sheer magnitude of a number is unfathomable, and Schwartz embraces the challenge of expressing these magnitudes and understanding them once we express them. I recently spent some time grappling with impossibly huge magnitudes in my post on Graham’s number, and I appreciated the playful way Schwartz approached “plex” and other efficient ways to write about very large numbers. He invites the reader to jump in and play with them too.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The book is cheerfully illustrated and includes interesting factoids to help us get an intuitive feel for large quantities, from how many grains of sand you could fit into a basketball (a lot) to how many ways there are to visit the capitals of the lower 48 states (a lot more). Although it is written for children, I found it enjoyable, and I think many other adults will too. I hope others are just as stumped as I was on some of the questions in the text. (This one got me: is 10×9×8...×2×1 or 222 larger?)

Schwartz recognizes the fact that not everyone will be able to understand his book the first time through. He writes,

“Before we get to the numbers, I want to tell you something about this book: It is like the game of bucking bronco I used to play with my daughters. The ride starts out slow and gets faster. The game is to stay on for as long as you can. If you fall off without finishing the whole book, don’t worry. This book isn’t something that you have to read all at once, or even all in one year. Just read as far as it makes sense and then save the parts you don’t understand for later.”

Many math writers, including me, work hard to make math accessible. But the approach Schwartz takes is refreshing. He works hard to make the ideas accessible, of course, but he doesn't want to limit the book to concepts that we can all grasp immediately. The things we don’t understand now do not represent failure but an opportunity for growth.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe