The Longest Matrilineal Chain in Math

Tracing our mathematical foremothers

a sepia photograph of two women, Annie Kenney and Christabel Pankhurst, holding a sign that says "Math for women." (In the original photograph, it says "Votes for women.")

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Mathematics Genealogy Project (MGP) is a website that collects information about the advisors and students of PhD mathematicians. It can be fun to waste a little time clicking around the site, finding famous ancestors (I’m one of Leonhard Euler’s 113,581 known mathematical descendants) or figuring out who else is in your or your favorite mathematician’s lineage.

There are quite a few women in my mathematical family tree, but none of them are my direct ancestors. That got me wondering about the longest chain of women advisors and advisees. The MGP does not include gender data, but I know the names of some prominent women in math from the 19th and early 20th centuries, so I started exploring.

Sofya Kovalevskaya is considered by most people to be the first woman to earn a doctorate in mathematics (she did so in 1874 from the University of Göttingen), but her only student, Emil Stenberg, was a man. Charlotte Angas Scott, who earned a doctorate in 1885 from Cambridge University, was as far as I can tell the first woman to graduate a woman student. (She was the first woman to have a doctorate in mathematics in America, although she was not the first American woman to have a doctorate in mathematics. She achieved the former by crossing the Atlantic.) Between 1896 and 1925 she graduated eight women math PhD students from Bryn Mawr, but none of them advised doctoral students.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Winifred Merrill was the first American woman to receive a PhD in math, which she did from Columbia in 1886, but again she did not have students. Anna Pell Wheeler, who earned a PhD in 1910, advised six women PhD students at Bryn Mawr. One of them, Dorothy Maharam, had four students of her own, all of whom I believe to be men. Emmy Noether had two women PhD students, Margarethe Hermann and Ruth Stauffer, but neither advised doctoral students.

After striking out on these early mathematical foremothers, I decided to check the Olgas. (In my experience, Olga seems to be an especially mathematical name.) Olga Taussky-Todd’s student Hanna Neumann advised ten students, as far as I can tell all men. There were several women among Olga Oleĭnik’s 48 students listed in the MGP (the MGP is more accurate for American than Russian mathematicians, so 48 may be an undercount), but none of them advised students.

With Olga Ladyzhenskaya, I may have hit the jackpot. Her student Nina Uraltseva has advised 13 students. Two of Uraltseva's women students, Arina Arkhipova and Nina Ivochkina, have advised women students of their own. In total, there are five advisor-advisee chains of length four containing only women. Several of these women could still be advising students, so these chains may continue to grow.

I don’t know a good way to search MGP or any other resources for long chains of women mathematicians, so I may have missed some. (Know of a longer chain of women with women advisors? Please tell me about it!) In the end, it’s more of a curiosity than anything else. Focusing only on direct doctoral advisors is a coarse measure; students learn from and are mentored by many others aside from their official advisors on their way to their degrees. And gender is not binary, though our histories usually assume people are either men or women, based on assignments made at birth. I hope that if anyone dusts off this blog post in a few hundred years they will find my fixation on gender confusing, but today I like knowing that among the thousands of chains of men advised by men, there are a few women who form chains of women advisors and advisees.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe