What I Wrote this Year

Another year, another year in review.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


As is its wont, the end of December has me reflecting on what I have done during the past year. I wrote a lot of posts here on Roots of Unity, but I noticed that my favorites fell into a few categories.

Favorite spaces

Back in March, I started a new series on the blog: a few of my favorite spaces. It started as a way to revisit some classic examples in my topology class, but I’ve branched out a little, and I hope to branch out more in the next year. My favorite post from that series is probably the one about Cantor’s leaky tent, if only because I loved sharing my impressive illustration skills, but the house with two rooms led me to discover a cool video made in Minecraft by a former colleague’s kid, so it is a close runner-up.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Pretty things
It is a well-known fact that pretty things are pretty. Pretty mathematical things are pretty and mathematical. This year, I especially enjoyed writing about Emily Grosholz's mathematical poetryBob Bosch’s optimization art and Malin Christersson’s hyperbolic tiling tool

What it feels like to be a mathematician

Mathematics makes people feel things, and some of my favorite posts were about those feelings. I really enjoyed reading correspondence between Carl Friedrich Gauss and Sophie Germain and seeing how Johann Heinrich Lambert got within inches of discovering hyperbolic geometry outright while wrestling with his personal distaste for some of his discoveries.

I also enjoyed writing about the media and the genius myth, where I wondered how we could get beyond the idea that only people with an innate math brain can be successful in and enjoy mathematics. (See also my genius myth post on the Blog on Math Blogs.) Somewhat related is the post I wrote earlier this week about contrasts in number theory: Shinichi Mochizuki's work on the abc conjecture and Piper Harron's funny, "laysplained" thesis offered an interesting juxtaposition of different approaches to explanation in mathematics.

Although my post about running pace and the intermediate value theorem was on its face about mathematics itself, it was also about how mathematicians might approach the question and the dangers of relying too much on intuition.

Goofy quizzes

One of the things I love about being a mathematician is the way it helps me see the world differently. Even when it doesn’t have a practical impact on my life, it enriches my experience. Case in point: when I visited the architectural masterpiece La Pedrera in Barcelona this summer, I saw tons of different shapes in the parquet floor there. The logical conclusion was to create a highly scientific personality quiz based on which shapes jump out at you.

The other quiz I made this year is about mathematics and poetry. Inspired by JoAnne Growney, I found some quotations that sound like they could be about either poetry or mathematics and made you try to figure out which ones were which. No matter your score, in this quiz, everyone’s a winner.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe