A Marvelous Example of a Kīpuka

Lava flows don't always destroy everything in their path. And we have a word for what survives

Public domain image courtesy USGS.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


There's something about older lava flows that I love quite a bit. You know, the ones that are old enough to have mellowed a bit, but not so old that they've had stuff grow all over them yet. It's probably an artifact of growing up with Sunset Crater in Arizona, but that thing seemed almost all lava flow. The flows on the San Francisco Peaks were old and obscured. So the ones on Pacific Northwest volcanoes charm me: they're huge, yeah, but rather wee things compared to the size of the mountains that spawned them. And they're often surrounded by such lush greenery, or they're hard bits in large expanses of loose pyroclastic materials. It really makes them pop.

This is the lower bit of the Floating Island lava flow on Mount St. Helens. This beauty is extremely young: it only erupted sometime in 1799-1800. It was on the north-northwest flank, and it's quite hard to see now on account of the debris avalanche and lateral blast that mangled the northern side of the volcano. This is what it looked like before May 1980. Wonderful, wasn't it?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Image shows a forested mountain flank with a long, narrow, dark gray lava flow spilling down it. There are a few places within the flow where thick patches of trees have survived. There are several clear-cut areas visible in the distance.
Aerial view from southeast of lower part of "Floating Island" lava flow from Mount St. Helens. Skamania County, Washington. September 28, 1979. Image and caption courtesy USGS.

There's an exceptional example of a kīpuka here: see that island of forest in the island of lava? There's more than one, but it's the big crescent-shaped one I'm looking at just now. Something got in the way of the lava flow here. Maybe there was a ridge, or a ravine, or something else that made it flow around like water split by a protruding stone. And so we have this patch of forest that was once surrounded by molten stone, surviving and thriving happily while everything around it perished.

Kīpukas aren't always filled with forest, but they're always distinct from the surrounding young flow, even if they just happen to be older rock. And there. Now you've seen a bit of Mount St. Helens as she was, and learned a Hawaiian term for a really neat bit of lava flow morphology. See if you can find a kīpuka of your own the next time you explore one of your favorite volcanoes.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe