Geologists’ Manslaughter Verdict Overturned and Other Stories: A Cornucopia of Earth Science Links

Whilst I’ve been off designing geology-themed holiday cards and working on other time-devouring things, other folks in the geoblogosphere have been doing some fascinating writing.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Whilst I've been off designing geology-themed holiday cards and working on other time-devouring things, other folks in the geoblogosphere have been doing some fascinating writing. I thought I'd bring some to you!

Chris Rowan has the story of the Italian geologists whose conviction for manslaughter was recently overturned. This is critical news for anyone doing science, and for the public they serve. There are a lot of lessons to learn from the whole sorry affair.

However, although the manslaughter charge was always senseless, as David Wolman’s compelling account makes clear, there are still some hard lessons to be learnt from this tragic affair. I’ve argued before that a lot of harm comes from the whole mistaken idea that earthquake risk assessments can be given and adjusted in real-time, but the way this specific situation was handled at the time was also wanting, in ways I may have been slow to appreciate.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Anne Jefferson has a wealth of environmental earth science news for ye. There's a lot of great stuff for anyone interested in things like renewable energy, and also this bit of brain candy for anyone interested in how rivers get all turny-twisty:

This is really neat. I heard one of the authors talk about this at the Geological Society of America meeting a week or so before this. It's particularly interesting because the dominant thinking has been that river meander migration rates are dominantly controlled by slope and discharge and models of meander behavior don't even require sediment. (We actually see similar meandering in the atmospheric jet stream, the ocean Gulf Stream, and meltwater streams on top of glaciers...all places where sediment is not involved.) But this work suggests that there may be an important role of sediment supply in setting up river behavior that we've been missing. Science!

If you're not already reading Anne and Chris regularly, I encourage you to begin. They're fantastic.

You love geology that's literally outta this world, right? You should be reading Emily Lakadawalla, who's a planetary geologist, and has got the most delicious updates for ye. She's following Curiosity's exploration of Mars's Pahrump Hills outcrop, and has got a mystery to solve:

Here are two very interesting spots at Pink Cliffs that Curiosity has re-examined up close. I've never seen anything at the Curiosity landing site quite like these lens-shaped crystals. They're quite different from the blockier plagioclase feldspar laths we've seen in volcanic rocks elsewhere in Gale crater. I'm dying to know what their chemistry is, and what that chemistry means for the watery history of this rock.

People, we are doing field geology. On Mars. Have I told you lately how happy I am to be alive at this particular time and place?

Mika McKennon has a wonderful post up on weathering:

Rocks are not eternal. Even the tallest mountain will eventually dissolve and disintegrate. Geologists call this process "weathering." It sounds harmless enough, but weathering is one of the most destructive forces on the face of the planet.

This is an excellent primer for those who want to learn the basics of how weathering affects rocks, and includes a bonanza of awesome photos. Do enjoy! And keep up with other geological goodness with Mika.

Lockwood DeWitt has been chronicling our trips for the past nearly two years, one post per day - it'll be 686 posts so far as of today! There's some incredible things you can explore from the first year through the index. For this year, maybe you'd like to start with the Bridge of the Gods?

See the bridge? No, not the steel truss cantilever bridge on the left, but the land bridge that extends out to it. According to the latter link, there is considerable disagreement in the radiometric carbon dates obtained for the landslide's age, with the most recent measurements suggesting a date of about 1450, but ranging from 1060 to 1760 AD. My take on these wide ranges is that it's not likely due to inaccuracy of lab measurements, but difficulty ascertaining which wood samples are directly related to the Bonneville Slide.

I'm eventually going to be doing you up a post on the Bonneville Slide. You're gonna love it. And if you love Oregon geology, you really really need to be following Lockwood's blog henceforth.

Glacial features in Nevada? Really? Yes, really! Silver Fox shows us a bonza hanging valley:

By Yosemite standards, this cliff is really not that high above the valley floor, and there isn't a waterfall pouring out of our hanging valley, the way Bridalveil Fall rushes over the cliffs near Cathedral Rocks, but our little cleft is green with dense vegetation, indicating that the creek flows at least part-year (a feat in and of itself in Nevada) — and you can drive right to it. On pavement! (Pavement in Nevada is a real bonus.)

Silver Fox is, was, and always will be one of my favorite bloggers. If you love desert landscapes and gorgeous photos, she's got the blog for you. Keep reading!

There. Now you have a cornucopia of links to enjoy, wonderful bloggers to follow, and pictures to delight eye and mind. Take some time to savor them. And do please stay tuned to Rosetta Stones for more Creationist textbook fun, plus the upcoming continuation of our Mount St. Helens series! I've got lots planned for ye. Now I just need to find a way to acquire more time for it all...

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe