Geopuzzle: One of These Three Postulations Is Right Out

Can you determine the least likely scenario?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Those informational signs at various attractions can sometimes be more aptly described as

The offending Summer Lake sign. Credit: Dana Hunter

mis-informational. This tends to frustrate the geotraveler: responses may include groans, gripes, and rolling eyes. One severely-annoyed geologist at Summer Lake, Oregon took matters (and a Sharpie) into their own hands, and engaged in a little correcting-their-fieldwork.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


If it's educational, is it still vandalism - or a public service? Asking for a geologist.

One sign that's just begging for the Sharpie treatment is this one at Deception Falls.

Two plausible and one frankly impossible hypotheses. Credit: Dana Hunter

It's displayed at a fascinating part of the Tye River, where it goes from a broadish (if rocky) channel to a rather vigorous falls, and then makes a razor-sharp 90° turn to flow through a narrow, straight grandiorite channel.

The river turns sharply! Credit: Dana Hunter

Wow, right? That's some dramatic geology, that is. Rivers don't usually do that.

The sign gives three speculations as to how this odd feature formed. Have a look at the video of the falls, and then see if you can spot the laughably ridiculous hypothesis:

1. Log Jam: Did a maclargehuge flood carry a load of logs down and dam the river, diverting it long enough to cut a new channel at a 90° angle to the original?

Log pile left by flood waters at Deception Falls. Credit: Dana Hunter

2. Dike. Did the river erode away a dike of softer rock? The granitic bedrock at Deception Falls is cut by a myriad of dikes in various igneous materials.

Small (possibly andesite) dikes cutting through bedrock. There are several large dikes of basalt and other igneous rock around the area as well. Credit: Dana Hunter

3. Fault. Did the river attack the crushed and broken rock of a fault, finding it easier to remove than unbroken bedrock?

A waterfall on Deception Creek plunges through a probable fault zone. Credit: Dana Hunter

Bonus geoblogosphere points shall be awarded to those who make a case for one or both of the remaining options.

A version of this post previously appeared at En Tequila Es Verdad.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe