This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
I'm still going through the USGS image database for Mount St. Helens. It's going to take me a while - there are almost two thousand images to sort, catalog, and save. I'm sharing some of the best of what I find on Facebook: I'll be sharing them here, too!
Really magnificent pre-eruption photo of Mount St. Helens. Definitely enlarge this. You'll see some fabulous glacial geology, inverted topography, old lava domes, and Mount Adams. Drooling now. Definitely click for the full image.
Pre-eruption aerial view northeastward of Mount St. Helens in the foreground, Mount Rainer in background. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Here's a nice visual explanation of the May 18th eruption.
Simple diagram by J.G. Moore showing Mount St. Helens eruption sequence of May 18, 1980. Skamania, County, Washington. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
For my Oregon peeps: Mount St. Helens in eruption, with Mount Hood in the background.
Mount St. Helens in eruption, looking toward the southeast on May 18, 1980, with snow-covered Mount Hood on the distant horizon. Skamania County, Washington.
Eerie photo taken right after the May 18th eruption. We're looking across Spirit Lake. In the foreground, steam bursts from fumaroles in the blast deposits.
Oblique aerial view across Spirit Lake after the eruption of Mount St. Helens; secondary steam fumaroles in blast area in foreground. Skamania County, Washington. 1980. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
Absolutely gorgeous image of fumaroles on a pyroclastic flow from May 18 1980.
Fumaroles on pyroclastic flow of May 18 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Skamania County, Washington. June 1, 1980.
This is a rather gorgeous fumarole on a pyroclastic deposit from the May 18 eruption, with geologists for scale. You know, catastrophic destruction makes for magnificent landscapes.
Fumaroles and geologists on pyroclastic flow of May 18 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Skamania County, Washington. July 1, 1980. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
Geologists watching the August 7th, 1980 eruption. Dunno about you, but I'd have to spend a lot of time and effort screwing my courage to the sticking-place before I'd be able to stand there filming the volcano going boom after what it did in May.
Time lapse of August 7, 1980, eruption of Mount St. Helens. Geologist in foreground for scale. Skamania County, Washington. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
Eruptions are quite rough on volcano monitoring equipment. This is Kid Valley geodetic target after the eruption above got through with it.
Kid Valley geodetic target after August 7 eruption of Mount St. Helens. Skamania County, Washington. August 9, 1980. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
Here's a really lovely image from May 19th, 1982. You can see that Mount St. Helens hasn't quite gone back to sleep yet. Photo is by Lyn Topinka, who has taken many marvelous pictures of that volcano. You'll see more of her work as we go along.
Mount St. Helens reflected in Spirit Lake, two years after the eruption of May 18, 1980. Skamania County, Washington. May 19, 1982. Photograph by Lyn Topinka. Image and caption courtesy USGS.
I'll have more lovely photos from before, during, and after May 18th, 1980. I've also got some non-volcanic adventures planned for this month. We're going to be venturing into geology quite different from the young stuff around Western Washington. Stay tuned!
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.