No Apparent Danger: The Book Every Volcano-Monitoring Skeptic Should Read Right Now

A horrifying case study in the importance of watching the active volcanoes in our midst

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


No Apparent Danger: The True Story of Volcanic Disaster at Galeras and Nevado Del Ruiz by Victoria Bruce

This book made me incredibly angry*, and it's one of the most important books I've ever read. If I had tons of money, I'd give a copy to literally everyone. Should you buy this book? Yes.

Do you know anyone who's skeptical about the necessity of monitoring volcanoes? Send them this book and let them know their opinions won't be entertained until they've read it in full.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Do you know anyone who's thinking of becoming a volcanologist? They need a copy.

If you read it yourself, you need to be prepared.

This deceptively short book packs more human suffering and official incompetence into its pages than most people can handle in a sitting. The details of what even quite small volcanic eruptions can do to a human body are gruesome and vivid. The horror of losing colleagues and loved ones is powerfully evoked. Victoria Bruce doesn't go out of her way to describe the stupefying brutality of an eruption and its aftermath. She doesn't use a thesaurus of the macabre to get her points across. She just matter-of-factly explains what happens using calm, precise prose. It's all she needs.

In No Apparent Danger, Bruce tells the stories of two lethal Colombian volcanoes; Nevada del Ruiz, which killed 23,000 people when a minor eruption melted its glaciers and buried towns downstream in massive lahars, and Galera, which killed nine scientists and tourists during a tiny phreatic eruption almost a decade later. She has empathy for the officials and scientists who were suddenly faced with active volcanoes and almost no means to figure out what might happen next, but she doesn't flinch from cataloging the many political, cultural, and scientific failures that led to avoidable loss of life.

Bruce's writing is clear and crisp. She knows how to explain the science for lay readers without making it too watery for experts to appreciate. She knows exactly which details to place precisely where they will build tension, even when you know how the story ends. She is phenomenal at evoking the essence of people and places, without having to waste words. Like the best novelists, she engages all the senses. And she builds her case like an expert attorney.

By the end, you'll be a fervent fan of volcano monitoring, and you'll also know what you should and should not look for in a person who's about to lead a field trip into an active volcano. I literally cannot recommend this book enough. And if anyone you know scoffs at volcano monitoring, be sure they've got a copy — and send one to anyone in charge of funding or policy decisions who seems to be skeptical as well. This is also an excellent book to give any groovy granola folks who think volcanoes won't ever harm them.
 

*Prepare to be thoroughly infuriated. I finished this book angry and stayed angry. Over a month later, I'm still angry. This is a good thing! I'm the kind of angry that helps me encourage officials to take volcano monitoring seriously, and bloody well fund it. (And I won't have to expend a lot of time and energy convincing them as long as they read a copy of this book.)
Originally published at Dana Hunter's Unconformity.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe