Suggestion Box

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Thank you all for the very warm welcomes and gorgeous enthusiasm! You gave Rosetta Stones a fantastic launch.

With introductions out of the way and the furniture pretty much arranged, it's time to get out in the field. Where would you like to go? Consider this our suggestion box.

Do we begin at the beginning, with a short course in geology? Play about with rock types? Jump in with both feet and go exploring a landscape - and if so, what kind? Are there any news items of geological interest you'd like to investigate?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


We already have more than rocks in the box. Rick, commenting over at ETEV, would like to "figure out why limestone doesn’t taste like lime in my cerveza." That's something I pondered, possibly too much, as a kid. So we'll be having a limestone day round here soon. Stock up on tequila and lime, or your preferred equivalents.

Bora said, "I hope we’ll get to read, at least sometimes, a little bit of her science-fiction writing, or some of her poetry. Perhaps mixed in with her science." We could do an excerpt or two, if you like. I could show you bits of the worlds I've built, together with a scene or so. Anyone else interested?

Malachite (nice!) says, "A post about Mount St Helen’s would be great, too." Can do! I've actually got a series started: we can just move it on over here.

I'd like Rosetta Stones to be a place where readers get a chance to choose topics. It's really all about you guys. So throw some ideas into the box. I'll plunge a hand in, take a topic out, and off we'll go!

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe