IgNobels, 2013: The Safety Engineering Prize!

Today we continue our coverage of the 2013 IgNobel Prizes with the Safety Engineering Prize! Sadly, the author of the patent for this prize has since passed on.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Today we continue our coverage of the 2013 IgNobel Prizes with the Safety Engineering Prize! Sadly, the author of the patent for this prize has since passed on. But it doesn't make the prize itself any less deserved.

US Patent #3811643, Gustano A. Pizzo, "anti hijacking system for aircraft", May 21, 1972.

So...what is it? It's an antihijacking system for aircraft. The idea is that the hijacker (presumably after being caught by the crew, there's no mention of this first bit), is placed in a special compartment behind the captain's area. The compartment floor has a hatch, which opens and drops the hijacker into a net. The net then gets dropped into a parachute. The newly-installed bomb-bay doors on the bottom of the plane open, and the hapless hijacker is parachuted to the ground, where the police, having been alerted by radio, pick him up.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The original patent was filed in 1974, so I'm sure if it were implemented now (if all planes could be retrofitted with bomb-bay doors and strategically positioned nets), you could add things like a GPS tracker so the parachute could be tracked, maybe a floatation device in case he was released over the ocean, etc. But when it comes down to cases, it looks like the original catching of the hijacker is still up to us.

Scicurious has a PhD in Physiology from a Southern institution. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy and a Bachelor of Science in Biology from another respected Southern institution. She is currently a post-doctoral researcher at a celebrated institution that is very fancy and somewhere else. Her professional interests are in neurophysiology and psychiatric disorders. She recently obtained her PhD and is pursuing her love of science and writing at the same time. She often blogs in the third person. For more information about Scicurious and to view her recent award and activities, please see her CV ( http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/a-scicurious-cv/)

More by Scicurious

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe