The IgNobel Prize in Literature: I think we need another report.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This year’s IgNobel Prize in Literature goes to…the US Government. You might think that something as prosaic as the US Governmental bureaucracy machine would not really qualify for a prize in literature. But in fact, there is some truly stimulating prose out there in the world of red tape and government. Some deep philosophical truths emerge, insights about live, love, and the pursuit of happiness.

And these deep truths come out when you learn about reports. Especially reports on reports. And then you might one day find…we need another report.

“Subject: Defense Management: Actions Needed to Evaluate the Impact of Efforts to


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Estimate Costs of Reports and Studies”

The translation of this deep, yet complicated memo can basically be read as followed: this is a report evaluating the reports on the costs on reports. The conclusion? More reports.

Sadly, the US Govt declined to show up for their prize. Perhaps they were too humble to recognize their important contribution to world literature.

Scicurious has a PhD in Physiology from a Southern institution. She has a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy and a Bachelor of Science in Biology from another respected Southern institution. She is currently a post-doctoral researcher at a celebrated institution that is very fancy and somewhere else. Her professional interests are in neurophysiology and psychiatric disorders. She recently obtained her PhD and is pursuing her love of science and writing at the same time. She often blogs in the third person. For more information about Scicurious and to view her recent award and activities, please see her CV ( http://scientopia.org/blogs/scicurious/a-scicurious-cv/)

More by Scicurious

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe