Celebrating the birth of the solar cell

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor's Note: Scientific American's George Musser will be chronicling his experiences installing solar panels and taking other steps to save energy in 60-Second Solar. Read his introduction here and see all posts here.

I came across the following un-bylined news story from our June 1954 issue which I thought solarheads would enjoy. Not only does it recount the invention of the photovoltaic cell at Bell Labs, it provides one of the most elegant explanations I've seen of how the device works, though the predictions about its limited usefulness are charmingly dated. A brief excerpt from this story also appeared in the 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago column of our June 2004 issue.

Power From the Sun

A little wafer of adulterated silicon which converts sunlight directly into electrical energy was unveiled last month by Bell Telephone Laboratories. This solar battery is an outgrowth of transistor research. It works at an efficiency of 6 percent, which is comparable to the performance of an ordinary gasoline engine. Bell scientists believe that the figure can be raised to 10 per cent through straightforward engineering improvements. An assembly of wafers covering a square yard could turn out 50 watts of power. The device is not likely to replace large-scale power plants—a 30,000-kilowatt battery would have to cover some 100 acres—but the company expects it to be useful as a small power source for such applications as rural telephone systems.

The battery operates on the same principle that underlies the junction transistor, described by Morgan Sparks in Scientific American for July 1952. A "p-n junction" is set up in a silicon crystal. This means that the crystal is divided into two zones, one containing an impurity which produces an excess of movable electrons, the other an impurity which entraps electrons and produces movable "holes" (spaces where electrons should be). Across the junction between two such zones there is always a small voltage. A quantum of light falling on the junction may knock loose an electron from one of the crystal atoms, creating an electron-and-hole pair. Because of the existing voltage difference, the electron is pushed one way and the hole the other. If the zones are connected by an external circuit, a current will flow.

What has made possible the extraction of usable quantities of power from the arrangement is the discovery of a way to make large area junctions. In the solar battery a strip, about the size of a razor blade, of n-type silicon (containing arsenic) is treated with a gas containing a p-type impurity (boron). Bell engineers have found a way to control precisely the amount of boron taken up and the depth to which it penetrates. They produce a p-type layer less than one 10,000th of an inch thick, with a sharp boundary, over the entire strip. Thus, the whole surface becomes a source of current when sunlight falls on it.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It makes me nostalgic for the glory days of Bell Labs.

Solar cell inventors Gerald L. Pearson, Daryl M. Chapin, and Calvin S. Fuller in 1954. Courtesy of Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe