Do Actions Speak Louder than Feelings? [Video]

    // Editor's note: Brain Basics from Scientific American Mind is a series of short video primers on the brain and how we feel, think and act.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Editor’s note: Brain Basics from Scientific American Mind is a series of short video primers on the brain and how we feel, think and act. Below is a synopsis of the tenth video in the series written by a guest on this blog, Roni Jacobson, a science journalist based in New York City.

By Roni Jacobson


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov stumbled upon the work that would later make him famous while studying the digestive system. He noticed that the dogs in his lab would start to salivate—a natural biological response that helps break down food—when the research assistant who normally fed them entered the room rather than when they started eating. From this observation, Pavlov developed the principles of classical conditioning, in which an organism associates a neutral stimulus—footsteps or a bell, for example—with a stimulus such as food that ignites a biological response—say, salivation. After a while, the neutral stimulus starts to provoke the biological response on its own. That is, the dogs salivate in response to footsteps or a bell.

Psychologist John Watson expanded upon Pavlov’s research in a series of controversial experiments involving a young child known as Little Albert. By sounding an unpleasant noise every time the boy played with a white rat, Watson made Little Albert afraid not only of the rat but also of other white, fluffy things including other small animals and a white furry coat. Watson went on to establish behaviorism, an attempt to explain people through observable behavior without considering feelings, memories or other internal mental states. While behaviorists uncovered many important psychological principles, their approach was insufficient to capture the full complexity of the human condition. One additional piece of the puzzle is evolution: over millions of years, organisms become biologically predisposed to react to certain stimuli and to learn some associations over others.

Other Brain Basics videos:

Children Reason Differently from Adults

Multitask at Your Own Risk

Is Your Sense of Humor in Your Genes? Geneticists Crack the Code

Acts of Kindness Explained

Remember When…How Your Brain Builds A Memory

Terrified or Hopping Mad? What’s Going on Inside You

A Transformation of Light: How We See

Quick! What Is The Word for a Pair of Opposites?

The Hidden Power of Others Over You

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe