Star Filmmakers Found in Unlikely Spot

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


In Tyson Schoeber’s class at Nootka Elementary School in Vancouver, 15 fourth through seventh graders struggle to read, write or do math at a level near that of their peers in other classes. Ten-year-olds have entered Schoeber’s program, called THRIVE, virtually unable to read independently (see “One Man’s Mission to Save Struggling Students”). Yet Schoeber brings this group of students, all of whom have dyslexia or other learning disabilities, far above the grade in one unusual and challenging subject: filmmaking.

For the past four years, his students have participated in the Canadian portion of the Panasonic Kid Witness News contest, an international student filmmaking competition. Together, the kids choose and research important environmental stories, write the scripts, interview experts, narrate, create illustrations of scientific concepts, design costumes, make props, act, film and edit. A couple of years ago, a supportive associate superintendent with the Vancouver school board provided the funding to purchase a ceiling mounted LCD projector and big-screen for the students’ extensive technical work.

Filmmaking draws the kids into science—and out into the field, where they interact with decision-makers and scientists. It provides practice in reading and writing. It also gives them a huge sense of accomplishment, especially since the finished products have won major awards. A film the class created called "I Am Still Creek" that detailed the process of daylighting a long-buried stream, was deemed “Best Documentary” in 2009. Another, "LEEDing the Olympics," chronicling Vancouver’s attempt to build environmentally friendly venues for the 2010 Winter Olympics, captured the “Best News” category the following year.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And this month, the students learned they earned two awards for their most recent film, “Poisoning the World,” about the effects of rat poison overuse on owls and urban wildlife. The movie won the "Best Documentary" and "Best Video" categories of the contest, boosting the film to the international level of the competition. “That's the best we've ever done!” Schoeber says. This latest victory shows that children who do not score well on standardized tests can nevertheless make significant contributions to our society through perseverance and hard work. Watch these films to appreciate the talents and efforts of these children—and to learn something new and important about the world.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe