Crowdsourcing Women in Science and Engineering

I could statistic you to death about how women are still underrepresented in science and engineering, but let me just give you this one about what dismal progress we're making: between 2000 and 2011, the proportion of science and engineering bachelor's degrees awarded to women remained flat.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I could statistic you to death about how women are still underrepresented in science and engineering, but let me just give you this one about what dismal progress we’re making: between 2000 and 2011, the proportion of science and engineering bachelor’s degrees awarded to women remained flat. And worse, it actually declined in computer sciences, mathematics, physics, engineering, and economics.

We’re losing ground, people! We need to do something about this. Well, we need to do a lot of things about this, but one thing that comes to mind is improving the way we represent women in science and engineering. And right now, there are two great crowdsourcing projects happening in this arena.

Amy Poehler’s Smart Girls at the Party teamed up with PBS Digital Studios’ It’s Okay to Be Smart to launch the “Science Needs Women” project, asking fans to post videos about a woman in science who inspires them – dead, alive, your mom, anyone! They ask that you share your video with #sciencewoman and email your video link to sciencewomanvideo@gmail.com. The submission deadline is just one week away, Monday, March 2, so get your phone out and start talking to it about your favorite woman in science.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Now that we’ve covered a great way to bring attention to the real lives of women in science and engineering, what about fiction? What about science and engineering characters in TV and films? There is immense power in portraying women in these fields, giving countless women and girls a much needed fictional role model. This is the premise of the documentary Miss Representation.

In one interview with Geena Davis, she recounts how girls came up to her so often and said of her role in A League of Their Own, “I play sports because of that movie!”

Similarly, Lee Zlotoff who created the show MacGyver, starring an insanely resourceful secret agent, has said, “I literally could not tell you how many times people have come up to me and said, ‘I became an engineer, or I went into the sciences because of MacGyver.’”

With that in mind, Zlotoff has partnered with the USC Viterbi School of Engineering* to launch The Next MacGyver, a contest to find the next great TV show about an engineer, but this time starring a woman. It could be about a prehistoric woman who invents small machines, a futuristic time-traveling badass, or a present day hero who helps the world’s most impoverished communities. I don’t know. I’m not a screenwriter. But if you are, you have until April 17 to submit the title, genre, pilot episode summary, main character description, and three sample episode storylines at the contest website.

And in the meantime, at least we have Nyota Uhura, Ellen Ripley, and Trinity.

*Full disclosure: I am currently employed by the USC Viterbi School of Engineering.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe