‘Cosmos’ and ‘Your Inner Fish’ Pack the 1-2 Punch

Two weeks from today, on April 9th, PBS will air the first of a three-part series adapted from Neil Shubin’s popular book, Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year-History of the Human Body.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Two weeks from today, on April 9th, PBS will air the first of a three-part series adapted from Neil Shubin's popular book, Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year-History of the Human Body. If you've ever wondered why we're built the way we are - with five fingers on each hand, testes that hang outside our bodies, and backs and knees that leave us vulnerable to slipped discs and torn ligaments - this series will take you on a journey of discovery you won't soon forget.

It's an exciting series in its own right, but combined with the concurrent Cosmos series, it feels like something bigger is afoot in science communication: a new generation of inspiring science programming that uses incredible graphics with dynamic stories and larger-than-life personalities. The two programs have distinctly different styles, though, and with any luck will appeal to the broadest audience possible. Assuming you've already gotten a feel for Cosmos, here's a sampling of what's in store with Your Inner Fish:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Before April 9th, check your local television listings to see when and where you can catch the series. In the meantime, the producers have created an extensive website with teaching resources, episode guides, interactive graphics and more. It is something else!

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe