How Gluten Feels About All This

Elective gluten free dieting is all the rage these days–as opposed to people with Celiac disease who have needed to avoid gluten all along to avoid a serious autoimmune reaction.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Elective gluten free dieting is all the rage these days--as opposed to people with Celiac disease who have needed to avoid gluten all along to avoid a serious autoimmune reaction. But for the non-Celiac 99% of us, "gluten free" has become one of those dietary buzz words. In Los Angeles where I live, it has become something of a religion. I see gluten free bakeries pop up, and there are now gluten free sections of supermarkets. This is great for our Celiac brothers and sisters, but for everyone else, it gives the illusion of healthy choices when there is in fact no benefit to a gluten free diet if you don't have Celiac disease.

And this study published in the journal Gastroenterology found that people with self-diagnosed gluten sensitivity actually didn't feel any better when they were put unknowingly on diets without gluten. What this could mean is that the effects of gluten for non-Celiacs might be chalked up to placebo and nocebo effects. For those that swear they feel infinitely better when abstaining from glutenaceous (a word I just made up) foods, perhaps avoiding this particular protein leads you to make better food choices in general. But the researchers also point a finger at carbohydrates called fermentable oligo-di-monosaccharides and polyols, what acronym lovers call FODMAPs. We'll figure this all out, eventually, but for today, here's a comic to summarize:

And for an added bonus, here's a clip from Jimmy Kimmel in which his team found a few people in Los Angeles who proudly proclaim to be gluten free for all sorts of weird reasons but have no idea what gluten is, and in some cases what foods you can find it in. (Rice doesn't have gluten.)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe