In Case You’re Tempted to Think 3D Modeling All Looks the Same

I initially contacted Bryan Christie to request permission to feature his spectacular cheetah illustration in this year’s blitz. He agreed, and so here it is, in all its glory: But he also tipped me off to his fine art work that is equally worthy of note: How could two such disparate styles emanate from the [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I initially contacted Bryan Christie to request permission to feature his spectacular cheetah illustration in this year's blitz. He agreed, and so here it is, in all its glory:

But he also tipped me off to his fine art work that is equally worthy of note:

How could two such disparate styles emanate from the same person? Even more intriguing is the thought that both of these images are products of 3D computer modeling. We tend to think of computer models as slick, razor-sharp depictions, not vague or ambiguous, so it's no surprise that the cheetah illustration is done digitally (although I've said it before and I'll say it again that does NOT mean a computer did all the work!). Yet Christie's fine art series is all the more wondrous when you learn that it, too, is the product of 3D renders. He begins with 3D models of figures and their internal anatomy and prints out different poses on silk. He subsequently layers 3-12 of the print-outs on top of each other binding them with beeswax in a process known as encaustic. The results are other-worldly and push the frontier of what can be accomplished with 3D technology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As to why Christie began to branch out into fine art from his science and medical illustration career, he says, "Eventually I began to approach my illustrations more from the perspective of an artist than an illustrator; I became more interested in the feeling and mystery of a piece, rather than the data and information." He still does medical and scientific illustration work, but I would argue this artistic thread is what makes his illustration work stand out.

See Bryan Christie's entire portfolio, including both his science/medical illustration and his fine art, on his design studio website. He also arranges private studio tours by appointment if you happen to be in NYC.

___________

For the third year running, we are turning September into a month-long celebration of science artists by delivering a new morsel of sciart to chew on each day. Totally yum? Check out what was previously featured on this day:

2013: Periodic Table Jewelry by Molly Spilane at Unique Art Pendants

 

 

2012: 3D Dryptosaurus with artwork by Tyler Keillor

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe