In Case You’re Tempted to Think 3D Modeling All Looks the Same

I initially contacted Bryan Christie to request permission to feature his spectacular cheetah illustration in this year’s blitz. He agreed, and so here it is, in all its glory: But he also tipped me off to his fine art work that is equally worthy of note: How could two such disparate styles emanate from the [...]

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I initially contacted Bryan Christie to request permission to feature his spectacular cheetah illustration in this year's blitz. He agreed, and so here it is, in all its glory:

But he also tipped me off to his fine art work that is equally worthy of note:

How could two such disparate styles emanate from the same person? Even more intriguing is the thought that both of these images are products of 3D computer modeling. We tend to think of computer models as slick, razor-sharp depictions, not vague or ambiguous, so it's no surprise that the cheetah illustration is done digitally (although I've said it before and I'll say it again that does NOT mean a computer did all the work!). Yet Christie's fine art series is all the more wondrous when you learn that it, too, is the product of 3D renders. He begins with 3D models of figures and their internal anatomy and prints out different poses on silk. He subsequently layers 3-12 of the print-outs on top of each other binding them with beeswax in a process known as encaustic. The results are other-worldly and push the frontier of what can be accomplished with 3D technology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As to why Christie began to branch out into fine art from his science and medical illustration career, he says, "Eventually I began to approach my illustrations more from the perspective of an artist than an illustrator; I became more interested in the feeling and mystery of a piece, rather than the data and information." He still does medical and scientific illustration work, but I would argue this artistic thread is what makes his illustration work stand out.

See Bryan Christie's entire portfolio, including both his science/medical illustration and his fine art, on his design studio website. He also arranges private studio tours by appointment if you happen to be in NYC.

___________

For the third year running, we are turning September into a month-long celebration of science artists by delivering a new morsel of sciart to chew on each day. Totally yum? Check out what was previously featured on this day:

2013: Periodic Table Jewelry by Molly Spilane at Unique Art Pendants

 

 

2012: 3D Dryptosaurus with artwork by Tyler Keillor

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe