I recently did a comic for a non-profit called CO-ADD. Based at the Universtiy of Queensland in Australia, this effort asks chemists to send in compounds they’ve developed and for free, CO-ADD will screen them for antibiotic properties. And if they do find an effective antibiotic, the researcher still retains ownership. It’s an interesting new way to combat the superbug crisis.
This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
I recently did a comic for a non-profit called CO-ADD. Based at the University of Queensland in Australia, this effort asks chemists to send in compounds they’ve developed, and for free, CO-ADD will screen them for antibiotic properties. And if they do find an effective antibiotic, the researcher still retains ownership. It’s an interesting new way to combat the superbug crisis.
It’s odd to think there could be an effective drug sitting on shelf somewhere—a compound that wasn’t developed with drug properties in mind, but it’s possible. After all, that’s how we’ve discovered lots of antibiotics and other drugs in the first place—by stumbling across them. Whether it was the serendipitous discovery of penicillin or chemicals we’ve discovered in hotbeds of biodiversity like the Amazon rainforest—new possibilities can be hiding under rocks or collecting dust on forgotten laboratory shelves.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
I hope CO-ADD finds the next effective antibiotic, and I hope my silly comic helps the search in some small way!
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
