More Science for the Children

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A long time ago in a place very far away... I was thinking about writing science children's books. I did some research at the local bookstore. It seemed as though children's science books were either overwhelming picture encyclopedias with captions and loads of disjointed facts, or they were really slow, dry accounts of how butterflies emerge from their respective cocoons. Yawn.

I'm obviously not the target audience, as I am not 4 feet tall with an oral fixation. But really. Surely we can do better than this, right?

After a few freelance writing gigs for educational publishers, learning the ways of writing at a first grade level, I started to feel like I might be able to write what I considered a damn decent children's book about science. But what topic to tackle first?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


After spending an embarrassing amount of time mulling this over, I just recently bit the bullet and wrote a short children's book about cells. It's not a narrative story. The cells are not going on a grand adventure or anything like that. But the book does cover a few different types of cells we humans have: skin cells, blood cells, brain cells, muscle cells, immune cells, etc.

The drawings are incredibly simplified (and embellished with faces), but they are reminiscent of the cells' actual shapes and textures.

As far as science education goes, as a writer and former science teacher, I think that you need to be straightforward, sometimes silly, but never condescending. I'd like to think this book doesn't talk down to our little ones, as this is honestly how I would explain what cells are to a young'un, and I don't do baby talk. That's patronizing.

What do you think?

You can buy it on Amazon.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe