Pinch of Pigment: The Richness of Ultramarine

The Virgin in Prayer, 1640-50, by Sassoferrato. National Gallery, UK. When I write these Pinch of Pigment posts, alternate, catchier titles come to mind.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The Virgin in Prayer, 1640-50, by Sassoferrato. National Gallery, UK.

When I write these Pinch of Pigment posts, alternate, catchier titles come to mind. This one could be called "Why Blue is a Girl's Colour" or "The Economics of Symbols".

Ultramarine Blue is one of the most important pigments in Western fine art history. And it is because at one time, it was more expensive per ounce than gold.1


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Ultramarine blue owes its name to its passage from Afghanistan to Venice, Italy, and it means "over the sea". It's ground from- get this - lapis lazuli gemstones. Chemically speaking, it is a complex polysulfide of sodium alumino silicate, which is somewhat fugitive over time (that means it fades).2 Naturally, it tends to be a bit more of a reddish blue than greenish, and it was not replaced with a cheaper synthetic until 1826. Unlike many fine art paints, the synthetic form is not called "Ultramarine Blue Hue" to denote the imitation colour, but is instead called French Ultramarine.

In Renaissance Europe, creating a new painting often involved an artist, a patron and a church. If the patron was someone from the newly risen middle classes, they would want to show off their new found wealth by commissioning a work for a local church, to get in good standing and in some cases, to be immortalized by appearing as penitents painted as small figures in a corner of the painting. To show that they were pious (and had gobs of cash) they would give the artist funds for materials, including a certain amount of gold and ultramarine.

So. You are a painter in the Renaissance, and you have this really expensive pigment sitting there. The painting is for the church, so more than likely it will either be a birth of Christ scene, or a Christ ascending, being suspended on or descending the Cross scene. You ought to use the expensive paint on the most important figure: Jesus Christ. But in birth and Crucifixion scenes, Christ is typically semi-nude. Not a lot of opportunities for a brilliant blue.

So, the ultramarine blue goes to the next most important figure: the Virgin Mary.

(It does make me wonder, what would art history have looked like if the most expensive pigment were a brilliant red: would we have Virgins in red robes, or would Crucifixion scenes be even more bloody?)

This economic point held true for centuries, and so did the Madonna's portrayal in blue. Blue was symbolically imbued with the Virgin Mary's traits: feminine, pure and powerful.

So why isn't blue a "girl's colour" any more? Cheaper blues and more experimentation in fine art painting are only a tiny part of the answer: the waning power of the church, and the rise of middle class fashions still held blue for girls, pink and red for boys until the 1940's. As happens, trends swung another way and there was a reversal through marketing. The Baby Boomer generation were kids growing up with colour televisions and the reversal cemented into place.3

So the dominant trend today is only a recent one. And it could reverse again and bright, strong, ultramarine blues could be associated with feminine identities sooner than we think.

Popular geek culture in toys, comics, games and movies are hopefully seeing the delicate-and-pink trope being washed away, leaving new associations for the colour blue for the next generation.

References:

  1. The Secret Language of the Renaissance: Decoding the Hidden Language of Italian Art, Richard Stemp, 2006. p4

  2. Ultramarine: A 185-Year Old Secret, Alex Reis, The Chemical Blog, 2013.

  3. When Did Girls Start Wearing Pink? Jean Maglaty, Smithsonian.com, 2011.

  4. Top image The Virgin in Prayer, 1640-50, by Sassoferrato. National Gallery, UK.

  5. Bottom images, L-R: The Autobot Arcee from Transformers Prime © Hasbro; Captain Marvel painted by Dexter Soy © Marvel Comics; Ashley from Mass Effect 3 © Bioware, screen cap by John Tesh.

____________________________

All fine art paints are pigment particles bound in a sticky medium: vegetable oil (oils), gum arabic (watercolour) or acrylic polymer (acrylic).

This is the 4th post in the Pinch of Pigmentseries.

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe