Quick Twitter Tip for Attributing Art

When I see some amazing art posted on Twitter without attribution to the creator, especially by someone in science communication, I kind of lose it.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


When I see some amazing art posted on Twitter without attribution to the creator, especially by someone in science communication, I kind of lose it. Using Tineye.com and Google Search by Image, I usually track it down and try valiantly to communicate that they should add a credit. I usually lose the battle with my valiant side and come off like a snarky scoundrel. I'm terrible.

I spend a lot of time thinking about credit, and a little less time thinking about permission. When treatment of artists is at rock bottom, I usually focus on the baby step of at least adding their name.

Which is why I was kicking myself when I read some tweets and a magnificent blog post by illustrator Sarah McIntyre, aka @jabberworks.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Specifically, this:

Of course. If the artist is on Twitter, simply tag them in the photo. It's so simple! It doesn't even take up room in the tweet. Surely this is a bare minimum of acknowledgement that would help people who don't want to sully their wonderfully crafted tweets with artist names. (See? Scoundrel.).

It doesn't show up in the native Twitter app on my iPad, but it does on desktop or my iPhone version. So easy.

McIntyre has a lot to say about the business of illustration, and is advocating for respect with the #PictureMeanBusiness hashtag. It's brilliant.

Find more of Sarah McIntyre's work, including her illustrated children's books at the links below.

- -

 

You might also enjoy:

Mash-up This! Science Communication's Image Problem

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe