The Intelligent Use of Animations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Or, in other words: Don't do this. Do this:

Remember websites in the early 90s with their scrolling banners, cheezy tiled backgrounds, and blinking and twirling text? No matter how swanky html5 or the next coding language is, I hope I never utter the phrase, "sure, why not?!" when it comes to use of special effects in my visualizations. In fact, when Henry Reich, the creator of the popular YouTube channel MinutePhysics, and I were planning our workshop on special effects in visualization for the ScienceOnline 2013 conference several weeks ago, we had a good chuckle about the gratuitous use of special effects in animation. I guess we laugh about it so we don't cry...

With the Hamster Dance as a backdrop, I want to point out this hilarious cartoon by Jim Benton that was used last week to illustrate a post by Bora Zivkovic on commenting threads. Cartoons have been around for long before the internet, and like any successful medium, I suspect they'll be around, largely unchanged for a while. So I was particularly amused to see Benton make use of a very basic animation to get his point across - the addition of animated franken arms. The cartoon would stand alone, without the animation just fine, but what I love about it is that the crude nature of the animation itself - essentially just rotating two stiff arms back and forth - underscores the punchline that the commenter is a dolt. This is a great example of thoughtful, intelligent use of animation. Well played.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


See more cartoons by Jim Benton.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe