The Intelligent Use of Animations

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Or, in other words: Don't do this. Do this:

Remember websites in the early 90s with their scrolling banners, cheezy tiled backgrounds, and blinking and twirling text? No matter how swanky html5 or the next coding language is, I hope I never utter the phrase, "sure, why not?!" when it comes to use of special effects in my visualizations. In fact, when Henry Reich, the creator of the popular YouTube channel MinutePhysics, and I were planning our workshop on special effects in visualization for the ScienceOnline 2013 conference several weeks ago, we had a good chuckle about the gratuitous use of special effects in animation. I guess we laugh about it so we don't cry...

With the Hamster Dance as a backdrop, I want to point out this hilarious cartoon by Jim Benton that was used last week to illustrate a post by Bora Zivkovic on commenting threads. Cartoons have been around for long before the internet, and like any successful medium, I suspect they'll be around, largely unchanged for a while. So I was particularly amused to see Benton make use of a very basic animation to get his point across - the addition of animated franken arms. The cartoon would stand alone, without the animation just fine, but what I love about it is that the crude nature of the animation itself - essentially just rotating two stiff arms back and forth - underscores the punchline that the commenter is a dolt. This is a great example of thoughtful, intelligent use of animation. Well played.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


See more cartoons by Jim Benton.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe