What Will We Build After the #SciArt Storm?

The #sciart tweetstorm was huge success – bigger and more exciting than any of us could have imagined. Though we sent out an alert to fewer than 100 people before the launch, on the first day we racked up more than 4000 tweets!

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


The #sciart tweetstorm was huge success - bigger and more exciting than any of us could have imagined. Though we sent out an alert to fewer than 100 people before the launch, on the first day we racked up more than 4000 tweets! Glendon will be posting the final stats in the next couple of days to show just how hard we rocked the twittersphere, but before we wrap up we want to let you know that we have created a website where you can submit your email and be kept informed of projects that stem from the storm. Both a book and a conference have been suggested and we are looking seriously into both.

What struck me most about the success of the storm is the number of people who came out of the woodwork - I think we were all following a small subset of each other and this event really galvanized the community and allowed a lot of new connections to be made. The diversity of art shared was another unforseen bonus. From atop my little anthill, I felt I had a decent handle on all the amazing sciart that was happening out there and the major players involved... boy, was I wrong. The storm reminded me that the folks we feature on Symbiartic and the people we connect with personally are just the tip of the iceberg. If I ever felt like I was nearing the end of my pool of interesting projects and people to share (which I didn't, but work with me here for a sec), the storm washed up a world of exciting new activity in places I hadn't known to look. I hope it did the same for you.

We plan on the storm being at least an annual event, but we are also contemplating ways in which to compile the event into a book or some other celebration of its awesomeness. In addition, a major goal of ours remains thinking of novel ways in which to get our vibrant community together. In the absence of the ScienceOnline "unconference" that brought the three of us here at Symbiartic together, we are looking into ways to start a conference dedicated to sciart and visual communication in the sciences. If you would like to stay in the loop regarding these and any other developments that stem from this first #sciart tweetstorm, sign up here and please share!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Of course, the #sciart hashtag doesn't cease to exist after today, so let's keep filling each others' Twitter feeds with great science-based art and artful science. If you're not already aware, keep an eye out for our regular roundup of major #sciart exhibits across the country - we publish it every two months and always tweet it with the hashtag #sciart. Here's one we'll feature: a joint exhibit with John James Audubon and contemporary realist painter Kevin Sloan that opened today in Colorado Springs, CO. I was lucky enough to see it in person and it is incredible. This and many more will be listed.

In the meantime, keep on making and posting awesome #sciart and inspiring the masses!

Yours in art and science,

Kalliopi, Katie, and Glendon

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe