Who Needs a Paintbrush When You Can Use a Dead Fish?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


James Prosek is a person who continually challenges the neat categories we create to delineate where one discipline ends and another begins. In his own words:

I want to be able to be a writer and a painter and an illustrator and a sculptor and not have to be confined by the taxonomies of art making or of literature... Why are we so eager to draw these disciplinary walls?

One of his latest projects embodies this philosophy as he combines extensive research, a conservationist agenda, fierce artistic talent and skilled writing in a multimedia tribute to the humble eel.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


There is a book, titled Eels: An Exploration, From New Zealand to the Sargasso, of the World's Most Amazing and Mysterious Fish, which the New York Times reviews favorably (link below).

There are paintings, done in a traditional Japanese style known as gyotaku (fish printing), where paint is applied directly to a dead fish and subsequently applied to the paper.

And there is a documentary called The Mystery of Eels airing tonight on PBS at 8pm (but check your local listings). Catch it if you can. If not, the program will be available for streaming from PBS shortly after the broadcast.

Related links:

James Prosek online portfolio, including current exhibits and upcoming lectures

The New York Times' review of Prosek's book, Eels: An Exploration, From New Zealand to the Sargasso, of the World's Most Amazing and Mysterious Fish

An Interview with Prosek about his eel painting project

Watch James Prosek: Painting with Eels on PBS. See more from Nature.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe