Will Coming Twitter Changes Help Illustrators?

Twitter has plans to allow for longer tweets and replying to larger groups in conversations. Will these changes help illustrators?

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


(Image by Glendon Mellow)

Twitter is an essential platform for illustrators and artists to make connections and communicate with fans and potential clients. For people making #SciArt, it allows us to connect with fellow artists and forge community ties with scientists themselves. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Recently, Twitter announced some changes, such as links and images no longer counting against your 140 characters ( which currently reduces characters to 96). I had some thoughts about the pros and cons, and researcher Kausik Datta compiled them into a Storify alongside commentary by Anil Dash. Check it out:
 

Clearly issues that benefit illustrators, such as more room in tweets are offset by other features, like trolls entering into conversations with up to 50 people and spamming them all with an image. 

What other features would help illustrators, cartoonists, fine artists and image-makers? I've mentioned some of these before, but here's a short list of suggestions for Twitter. 

  • Defend artists' copyright the way they defend comedians' tweets. Twitter announced a while back they would delete plagiarized or unattributed tweets from comedians. But re-sharing unattributed artwork is still considered not worth fussing about. 

  • Verify artists. What if Twitter verified established artists from the way they do journalists, politicians and celebrities? Political cartoonists, comic book artists, fine artists, and kidlit illustraors all add a huge amount of value to Twitter, and are frequently re-shared without attribution.

  • Make discovering artists easier. I don't have a fully thought out version of this, but Imagine a badge that followed verified-accounts' artwork so you'd know you were looking at work from a pro that you could easily follow. If Daisy Ridley shared Rey fan art, a little symbol on the artwork could allow you to view the profile of the artist. 

  • Act on abuse reports. You've said you'll do this Twitter, and yet it hasn't happened. Women, people of colour, trans people and more still face abuse even as visual artists. We need to see their work and they shouldn't be mobbed off of the platform. At the very least, allow us to take down tweets with our artwork or remove ourselves from tweets with our @___ name. 

What other suggestions do you have for illustrators on Twitter? Let me know in the comments below, or tweet at me @FlyingTrilobite.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe