Your Kitchen Is a Chem Lab and This Is Your Textbook

Maybe you cook, maybe not, but I bet you eat from time to time. If you’re reading articles on Scientific American, I also bet you are at least partially interested in science, and whether you eat gazpacho or goulash, KFC or cronuts, you have to concede this point: cooking is essentially applied chemistry.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Maybe you cook, maybe not, but I bet you eat from time to time. If you're reading articles on Scientific American, I also bet you are at least partially interested in science, and whether you eat gazpacho or goulash, KFC or cronuts, you have to concede this point: cooking is essentially applied chemistry. The beauty of it, though, is that the chemistry education part kind of sneaks up on you unless you make a point of seeking it out.

That's something Microsoft-CTO-turned-chef Nathan Myhrvold has set out to change. Through a series of books and now a traveling photography exhibit, Myhrvold and his team at The Cooking Lab in Bellevue, Washington, are giving the art and science of cooking its long-awaited and much-deserved moment in the sun. Chefs, home cooks, and dedicated fast foodies, here's your textbook on the chemistry of cooking. And it's anything but dry.

__


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Links:

The Modernist Cuisine books, including Modernist Cuisine, Modernist Cuisine at Home, The Photography of Modernist Cuisine

Modernist Cuisine Photography Exhibit

Prints of Modernist Cuisine Photography

*A note in the spirit of transparency: Myhrvold's other current venture is a company called Intellectual Ventures which has received both good and bad press for its considerable investment in patents. Symbiartic is about covering what's what in the world of science and art, so regardless of what your position is on IV, Myhrvold's modernist cuisine venture is worth noting. But it does bring up interesting questions about whether you can separate the artist from the art. We welcome your thoughts in the comments section.

___________________

Every day in the month of September, we here at Symbiartic are serving up a different science artist for your viewing pleasure. Can't get enough? Check out what was featured on this day last year, the hugely popular Rhinoceros 1515 by Kazuhiko Nakamura. It was also our Image of the Week:

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe