Map of Brain's Speech Centers May Help `Locked-In' Patients Talk

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Wilder Penfield's famous homonculus map of the brain had a large area on one side capped by a gaping cartoon mouth labeled simply "vocalization."

During the 1930s, Penfield stimulated that same area, but was unable to elicit any recognizable utterances. A group of researchers led by Edward F. Chang of the University of California San Francisco has now had better luck. The team captured brain activity from the sensorimotor cortex of three epilepsy patients undergoing surgery who were asked to pronounce syllables like "bah," "dee," and "goo."

Recording with dozens of electrodes, Chang and colleagues produced a detailed map of the areas in the cortex that activate the anatomical structures involved with speech and also chronicled the synchronized firing of neurons in the various speech centers. "What wasn't known was how these populations of neurons were coordinated," Chang says. "It turns out that this question is a very critical one for understanding how speech works. The vocal tract is sort of like an orchestra where you have individual players like the lips, the tongue the jaw, what we call articulators. Speech arises from the coordination of these players." The research was published in the Feb. 20 Nature.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Neural codes, the electrical signals from the cortex that engage the vocal tract, could, in theory, be used one day as inputs to an artificial speech synthesizer for "locked-in" patients unable to speak—a still elusive goal of brain-machine technology researchers.

Image source: Nature Publishing Group

NOTE: A correction was made to Penfield's first name.

 

 

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe