Right now, there’s a giant blue chicken in Trafalgar Square

I really like chickens. They are fascinating, beautiful, unbelievably diverse, complicated birds. Im academically interested in them. Oh, and we should probably stop eating them.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I really like chickens. They are fascinating, beautiful, unbelievably diverse, complicated birds. I’m academically interested in them. Oh, and we should probably stop eating them. While in London recently for the Cryptozoologicon launch (yes, it went really well, thanks), the family and I went to Trafalgar Square. Obviously, I haven’t been there for a while, for I was surprised and delighted to discover….

…. a gargantuan blue cockerel, perched atop the Fourth Plinth. The Fourth Plinth was originally created for a statue of William IV but thereafter remained bare for over 150 years. Since 1999 it’s been used as a display stand for temporary pieces of art. Anyway, check out not only the size and stature of this amazing piece (it’s 4.7 m tall), but also the attention to detail, and the accurate, gravity-defying form of the comb and tail feathers. The piece was unveiled in late July 2013 and I’m kind of embarrassed to have only known about it for a few days. I have a great interest in giant, animal-themed pieces of public art.

So, what gives? Is this remarkable and wonderful piece a homage to the beauty, wonder, charisma and sheer significance of chickens, or perhaps of gallinaceous birds, or even birds or dinosaurs in general? Err, no, not exactly. Produced by German artist and Professor of Sculpture Katharina Fritsch, it’s said in some articles to be deliberately intended as witty feminist commentary on our portrayal of male significance through sculpture. In other words, as a reference to the tradition, I guess, of putting images of great MALE people up on platforms. Maybe I’m stupid, naïve or woefully male (or all three), but this didn’t occur to me at all – I would prefer to think that an enormous and beautiful statue of a giant cock is what it looks like. I’m not really a fan of the idea that things that look like things are meant to be oh-so-clever references to other things, but what the hell. However, online articles at BBC News say that it’s about “regeneration, awakening and strength” and it's also said to be a reference to French sporting pride, so take your pick. Enjoy the gigantic blue male chicken, whatever you think it’s meant to be about.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


One final thing. What sort of chicken is this exactly? Without seeing any of the bird's true colours, I'm finding it hard to work this out. The comb is too tall for an Australorp (and that would be an unlikely choice of breed anyway)… could it be a Drenthe? Thoughts appreciated.

For previous Tet Zoo articles on chickens and other gamebirds, see...

Darren Naish is a science writer, technical editor and palaeozoologist (affiliated with the University of Southampton, UK). He mostly works on Cretaceous dinosaurs and pterosaurs but has an avid interest in all things tetrapod. His publications can be downloaded at darrennaish.wordpress.com. He has been blogging at Tetrapod Zoology since 2006. Check out the Tet Zoo podcast at tetzoo.com!

More by Darren Naish

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe