Jane Austen is replacing Charles Darwin–and that’s a very good thing
Our ability to perceive all three dimensions, due in part to having two eyes on the front of our heads with overlapping visual fields, allows us to enjoy 3D summer blockbusters, but may have originally evolved for a simpler purpose: avoiding falling to our deaths.
This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
Our ability to perceive all three dimensions, due in part to having two eyes on the front of our heads with overlapping visual fields, allows us to enjoy 3D summer blockbusters, but may have originally evolved for a simpler purpose: avoiding falling to our deaths.
If you're going to be able to effectively navigate the world, one thing that seems almost indispensable is the ability to perceive depth. It's an ability that most of us take for granted, since it runs in the background of our minds, outside of conscious awareness. Philosophers going back hundreds of years, like Descartes, wondered whether the ability to see in depth was a feature inherent to the mind or if it required learning in the earliest days and weeks of life.
In the last few decades, researchers have become able to address that question by using the tools of modern cognitive and comparative psychology.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Photo of infant on visual cliff from Gibson & Walk's 1960 article in Scientific American magazine.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
