Oil Pollution is Making Gulf Dolphins Sick

For eighty-seven days in 2010, 210 million gallons of oil from wells below the Deepwater Horizon poured into the Gulf of Mexico. Researchers announced recently that as a result, Bottlenose dolphins in Louisiana’s Barataria Bay are suffering from a host of maladies, including lung disease and adrenal problems.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


For eighty-seven days in 2010, 210 million gallons of oil from wells below the Deepwater Horizon poured into the Gulf of Mexico. Researchers announced recently that as a result, Bottlenose dolphins in Louisiana's Barataria Bay are suffering from a host of maladies, including lung disease and adrenal problems. They're also losing their teeth. The research was conducted in August 2011, by a team of governmental, academic, and non-governmental scientists as part of the post-spill Natural Resource Damage Assessment.

To understand what the effects of oil contamination were on marine mammals like dolphins and whales, the team conducted health assessments on thirty-two Barataria Bay dolphins in 2011, a site chosen because that area was heavily oiled during and after the spill. The team compared those dolphins to twenty-seven from Sarasota Bay, Florida, where researchers were already conducting a decades-long study of dolphin health, and which was lucky enough to remain oil-free following the blowout.

The team sampled each dolphin's blubber, collected blood and urine samples, conducted ultrasounds, took body-size measurements, and more. The results were published in December in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I have an article in today's edition of the Washington Post Health and Science section describing the findings of the assessment. Here are some highlights:

“There’s disease in any wild population,” said lead researcher Lori H. Schwacke, branch chief of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Centers for Coastal Ocean Science. “But we just haven’t seen animals that were in such bad shape as what we saw in Barataria Bay.”

...

The researchers were particularly surprised to find that the Barataria Bay dolphins had unusually low levels of the adrenal hormones cortisol and aldosterone, compared with the Sarasota dolphins. When faced with a stressful situation, the adrenal glands typically pump out hormones, which in turn increase heart rate and blood sugar, preparing the animal for a fight-or-flight response. That response allows the dolphins to respond appropriately to stressful or threatening situations, such as being attacked by a predator.

...

About 25 percent of the Barataria Bay dolphins were also found to be significantly underweight in comparison with just one of the Sarasota Bay dolphins. Many had low blood sugar, and several had low red blood cell counts. For six of the Barataria Bay dolphins — but none of those from Sarasota Bay — blood tests revealed liver abnormalities.

...

“Some of the animals’ lung disease [was] so severe that we did consider those conditions life-threatening,” said researcher Cynthia R. Smith, executive director and director of medicine for the National Marine Mammal Foundation. At least one of the dolphins that the team examined died about five months later; a necropsy resulted in the relatively rare diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia.

It's worth pointing out that the cetacean populations in the northern Gulf of Mexico are stranding in record numbers, something that NOAA refers to as an "unusual mortality event," or UME. What's interesting is that the UME began several months before the Deepwater Horizon blowout.

What the research makes clear, especially by comparing the Barataria Bay dolphins to those from Sarasota, is that the oil contamination is seriously affecting the health of marine mammals (and other marine life as well). But some parts of the Gulf, including Louisiana's Barataria Bay, were already bad news for dolphins and other animals. The oil is but one from an array of environmental stressors and pollutants, which also includes shipping noises, toxic algal blooms, other types of industrial runoff, and more.

Head on over to the Washington Post to read the entire thing.

Schwacke L.H., Smith C.R., Townsend F.I., Wells R.S., Hart L.B., Balmer B.C., Collier T.K., De Guise S., Fry M.M. & Guillette L.J. & (2013). Health of Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Barataria Bay, Louisiana, Following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Environmental Science & Technology, 131218010126007. DOI: 10.1021/es403610f

All images via NOAA/Fisheries, used with permission.

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe