Connecting urban communities with agriculture

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American



On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


When I was in college (back in the early 1990's), I learned that the bulk of the US food supply was provided by roughly 3-5% of this nation's population. At the time, that 3-5% were mostly family-run farms and ranches that toiled the land, raised livestock, and took the personal financial risks to feed the rest of us, plus some of the world. There I was 17 years old, away from home, sitting in my very first college science class and the world changed in a moment. I was born and raised in the big city (Memphis, Tennessee, the largest city in state) and here I was in my Animal Science 101 classroom with 25 other students, most of which were from nearby rural communities. In that single moment I was awakened with a reality that ws unknown to me...My entire way of life was purchased by some other family's hard work adn sacrifice. I came to understand - really understand - how dependent my urban way of life was on rural communities. Until that moment, I had never considered where my food came from, what effort and energy and planning and luck it took to bring it to life, to harvest, to the market, to my plate.
For some reasons, agriculture is so mysterious to so many people --particularly to urbanites. It is a veiled industry and as a result most of us are disconnected from agriculture. That's a problem in my book. Even more of a problem as our population continues to grow. Some experts project that 70% of the population will live in cities by the year 2050! Who will feed us? How will they feed us?
Personally, I think it's a shame that agriculture outreach and education to urban communities is so limited. First, why is secondary agriculture education restricted to rural area schools.? I got a crash course in agriculture - the science and the culture - in college. I struggled quite a bit. I amused my classmates with my questions related to reproductive anatomy of farm animals, figuring out what exactly was silage and what a silo is, not to mention complex problems related to commodities and agriculture economics. I had no idea what was going on; however, most of my classmates did. That is because most of them had taken high school classes called Agriculture Education, Agriculture Economics, Agronomy, Animal Science and had participated in academic competitive clubs such as FFA adn 4-H. And those were the kids who weren't raised on family farms.
Second, why are State Fairs still stuck in a time warp? It's like 1950. Forever! With the growing popularity of Farmer's Markets in most major cities and the emergence of urban farming and organic farming, the Fair organizers would be wise to update programing format to include these modern agriculture experiences. It may also draw new audiences to fairs since these are 'formats' that are somewhat familiar to many urbanites.

Our nation is already experiencing some of the ills of this urban-rural disconnect. Food insecurity among our nation's poorest (with highest density of these populations in urban areas) and the prevalence of urban food deserts are contributing to our unhealthy bodies. Perhaps some fundamental education would be just what we need to get things back in balance.

DNLee is a biologist and she studies animal behavior, mammalogy, and ecology . She uses social media, informal experiential science experiences, and draws from hip hop culture to share science with general audiences, particularly under-served groups.

More by DNLee

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe