FAQ: What's a Typical Day Like for You? #DNLeeLab Version

A breakdown of how my days as a pouched rat researcher are spent

#ratwrangling

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


What's a day in the life like for you, a post-doctoral researcher who studies pouched rats? 

I get this question often. The truth is it varies, depending on the time of year/semester and whether I am in the field or not. Whether in the field (#DispatchesDNLee) or here in the States (#DNLeeLab) are full days of research work - the thinking, tinkering, reading, writing, handling animals, running experiments, collecting data, taking measurements, training students, analyzing data, re-writing, cleaning up, setting up, etc...You get it. I hope you do.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And alternating these tasks in a given day is exhausting. 

Right now, (here in the States) all my research work is done at my home institution, Cornell University. (Previously, I was at Oklahoma State University). I'm in a #DNLeeLab cycle and I'm in the middle of several activities at this very moment:

1) an observation study of female pouched rats to describe their reproductive biology. This requires daily observations and collections of physiological data. Sometimes I have to do #ratwrangling a couple of times a day.

2) Desperately trying to get manuscripts out. My field research and behavior experiments, from my time at Oklahoma State and Tanzania are being scored and analyzed (thank God for my Rock Steady Crew - my undergraduate assistants who help with experiments and video scoring).

   a) field study and natural history survey

   b) individual behavior variation 

   c) social behavior and interactions

This is cyclone of #datawrangling, #madreading, and #madwriting swirling in my mind and on my desk.

#madwriting

#datawrangling

My life is pretty cray-cray right now. Your girl would appreciate good vibes, prayers, and/or chocolate, flowers. Or better yet, send help. Asante sana.

 

DNLee is a biologist and she studies animal behavior, mammalogy, and ecology . She uses social media, informal experiential science experiences, and draws from hip hop culture to share science with general audiences, particularly under-served groups.

More by DNLee

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe