#NewProf Asks: How Do I Better Engage My Undergrads?

#NewProf ponders undergraduate student engagement in large lecture hall courses

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


I am sitting in on a big lecture course - Biology for Majors - that I will teach next fall. Faculty, both junior and senior faculty, rotate and teach core courses here. I haven't had to think about foundational biology in a decade and I'm taking notes on the material as well as the presentation emphasis of my senior colleague.

Thought bubble: Was there a memo about the rearranging and reassigning of organisms into different groups? Domains, Kingdom, Paraphyletic groups #howsway?!

Seriously, here I am in the course, sitting mid-range in this huge auditorium. I can see both my colleague's expression and note the level of engagement (via facial expressions and the amount of scribbling students are doing)...He asks simple feedback questions and no response. 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I decide right then and there: I will need Clickers for this course when I teach it. I need a way to gage student's comprehension of the material because the bio-feedback mechanism doesn't seem to really snag students. I notice the same in my large lecture hall (general biology for Nursing majors).

I'm a pretty emotive lecturer. I take up space and use my loud voice in class hoping to get some call-and-response action from my students, especially those in the back. I get little feedback - mostly a few polite murmurs and mumbled answers and often from the same handful of students.

So, now I'm super curious: Why won't students respond?

Why do I care about any of this?

1. Students shouldn't have to wait until they are upperclassmen taking specialty courses in smaller classrooms to finally experience an intimate engagement with their major or the material.

2. All students deserve the opportunity to feel vested in their higher education and to feel like they finally "get the material".

3. Lecture isn't a performance. Instructors aren't entertainers. Lecture is a very formal presentation of learning materials, but students aren't merely there to witness information. Students are there to engage with the information -- absorb it, integrate that information, chew it over, consider it, apply that info across the curriculum and ultimately demonstrate that comprehension on test day. 

Lecture halls can feel like hiding in plain sight, but I really want to encourage any students reading this to come out of the shadows. Don't hide; but more importantly don't hide your level of comprehension of the material. Education is an iterative process. We (Instructors) need your (students) feedback to know if we're on the right track. 

So, the next time your instructor asks a general question in class I want you to energetically puts those hands in the air and raises those voices high!

Image credit: Image 8975, Getty/ PhotoDisc, MARS

DNLee is a biologist and she studies animal behavior, mammalogy, and ecology . She uses social media, informal experiential science experiences, and draws from hip hop culture to share science with general audiences, particularly under-served groups.

More by DNLee

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe