September 28, 2016

#NewProf Gets Answers: How to Engage Students

#NewProf ponders undergraduate student engagement in large lecture hall courses

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American

On Monday, I asked how I could better engage my undergraduate students in my large lecture hall courses.

I wanted to understand what might be the reasons for this disconnect and get some ideas on how to gage my students' comprehension of the material. When I was an undergrad, I remember how miserable it felt to not understand and fall behind. I always thought it was my responsibility to catch up with where the professor is, that everyone else but me was on track and feeling like I could just rally to fill the gap.

No, I couldn't. And today, I still can't, except the gap is the one between my students and I. I wager other Instructors feel the same.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

I reached out to the cyber masses to help me understand this issue. I am pleased by the responses. Thank you for your help and your words. I was pleasantly surprised by the participation of actual students letting me know how they feel. Overwhelmingly, based on this officially unofficial imperfectly designed not-scientific survey - student anxiety is my foe to connecting with my students and getting them to engage.

This info solidifies my resolve to use clickers for future big lecture hall classes, but what do I do now?

Thanks to the wisdom of the crowd I got some answers and put the advice/ideas to work immediately in my Tuesday morning (yesterday) class.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American