LEGO Reveals Female Scientist Minifigures

After much rejoicing at the news last month that LEGO would mass-produce a set of female scientist minifigures, the company has released a prototype of the final set to its original designer, Ellen Kooijman (a.k.a.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


After much rejoicing at the news last month that LEGO would mass-produce a set of female scientist minifigures, the company has released a prototype of the final set to its original designer, Ellen Kooijman (a.k.a. Alatariel Elensar), who recently posted images of the box and individual parts on her blog.

Kooijman, a Dutch isotope geochemist and LEGO enthusiast, received her advance copy roughly two years after uploading her design for a set of 13 female minifigures to the LEGO Ideas incubator site, formerly known as CUUSOO. The resulting “Research Institute” set, featuring three of Kooijman’s original 13 figures, will be available for purchase from LEGO later this summer.

“I’m extremely excited to have the final set in hand,” writes Kooijman, who also visited the LEGO headquarters in Billund, Denmark, to discuss the set with several of the company’s product designers. “I can easily see the science stories unfolding, but maybe that’s just my nerdy imagination.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As we learned last month, the set includes three scientists: a paleontologist, a chemist, and an astronomer, along with instruments or examples of their work. The minifigures were based on Kooijman’s design, but LEGO clearly tried to repurpose as many existing elements as possible for the final figures. As such, the scientists each don previously released hair and torsos, with the exception of a newly designed lab coat for the chemist. I was happily surprised to find a double-sided head on each — a much appreciated feature that gives additional opportunities for storytelling and paints a realistic picture of scientists as normal people who experience the same frustrations and anxieties as everyone else.

I’m pleased that LEGO kept plainclothes on two of the three models. Also notable is the fact that, as with Kooijman’s original design, only one of the scientists wears glasses (and even those may be considered safety goggles). Among other things, this sets a smart example for children that being a scientist is more than a stereotypically “nerdy” endeavor. Since 2010, I have custom-designed minifigures of actual scientists and others in STEM communication, and it is no mistake that very few of them wear outfits that scream, “scientist.” (The new Research Institute astronomer, with her grey blazer and fuchsia scarf, actually bears a rather striking resemblance to my minifig of Harvard physicist Lisa Randall.) Together with the This is What a Scientist Looks Like blog, these projects support the idea that science is a common, everyday endeavor. They also encourage the public — especially youngsters — to embrace the concept of scientists as action-figure heroes.

It’s thrilling to see this set come to fruition after a whirlwind of public activism following the release two and a half years ago of LEGO’s controversial girl-focused Friends line. I highly recommend reading the full text of Kooijman’s post to get a feel for her thinking when designing these minifigures, and for additional details about what’s included. Finally, for those of you who, like me, are eager to get your hands on a copy of the Research Institute set, the wait is almost over; all indications point to its public availability by the end of August.

Photos courtesy of Ellen Kooijman.

Maia Weinstock is a science editor, writer, and media producer based in Cambridge, MA. She serves as the deputy editor at MIT News, and has worked previously at BrainPOP, Discover, and SPACE.com, among other outlets.

More by Maia Weinstock

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe