LEGO Reveals Female Scientist Minifigures

After much rejoicing at the news last month that LEGO would mass-produce a set of female scientist minifigures, the company has released a prototype of the final set to its original designer, Ellen Kooijman (a.k.a.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


After much rejoicing at the news last month that LEGO would mass-produce a set of female scientist minifigures, the company has released a prototype of the final set to its original designer, Ellen Kooijman (a.k.a. Alatariel Elensar), who recently posted images of the box and individual parts on her blog.

Kooijman, a Dutch isotope geochemist and LEGO enthusiast, received her advance copy roughly two years after uploading her design for a set of 13 female minifigures to the LEGO Ideas incubator site, formerly known as CUUSOO. The resulting “Research Institute” set, featuring three of Kooijman’s original 13 figures, will be available for purchase from LEGO later this summer.

“I’m extremely excited to have the final set in hand,” writes Kooijman, who also visited the LEGO headquarters in Billund, Denmark, to discuss the set with several of the company’s product designers. “I can easily see the science stories unfolding, but maybe that’s just my nerdy imagination.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As we learned last month, the set includes three scientists: a paleontologist, a chemist, and an astronomer, along with instruments or examples of their work. The minifigures were based on Kooijman’s design, but LEGO clearly tried to repurpose as many existing elements as possible for the final figures. As such, the scientists each don previously released hair and torsos, with the exception of a newly designed lab coat for the chemist. I was happily surprised to find a double-sided head on each — a much appreciated feature that gives additional opportunities for storytelling and paints a realistic picture of scientists as normal people who experience the same frustrations and anxieties as everyone else.

I’m pleased that LEGO kept plainclothes on two of the three models. Also notable is the fact that, as with Kooijman’s original design, only one of the scientists wears glasses (and even those may be considered safety goggles). Among other things, this sets a smart example for children that being a scientist is more than a stereotypically “nerdy” endeavor. Since 2010, I have custom-designed minifigures of actual scientists and others in STEM communication, and it is no mistake that very few of them wear outfits that scream, “scientist.” (The new Research Institute astronomer, with her grey blazer and fuchsia scarf, actually bears a rather striking resemblance to my minifig of Harvard physicist Lisa Randall.) Together with the This is What a Scientist Looks Like blog, these projects support the idea that science is a common, everyday endeavor. They also encourage the public — especially youngsters — to embrace the concept of scientists as action-figure heroes.

It’s thrilling to see this set come to fruition after a whirlwind of public activism following the release two and a half years ago of LEGO’s controversial girl-focused Friends line. I highly recommend reading the full text of Kooijman’s post to get a feel for her thinking when designing these minifigures, and for additional details about what’s included. Finally, for those of you who, like me, are eager to get your hands on a copy of the Research Institute set, the wait is almost over; all indications point to its public availability by the end of August.

Photos courtesy of Ellen Kooijman.

Maia Weinstock is a science editor, writer, and media producer based in Cambridge, MA. She serves as the deputy editor at MIT News, and has worked previously at BrainPOP, Discover, and SPACE.com, among other outlets.

More by Maia Weinstock

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe