Money Aside, Who Goes to Rehab? White Alcoholics

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


We often hear of addicts' journeys leading to a stint in an rehabilitation facility or perhaps even multiple stints. But who goes to rehab and what does it say about our perception of addiction?

Rehab facilities, originally called "sober houses" and founded to create an isolated area removed from the temptations of substance abuse, are visited by a very small subset of the addicted population. In 2009, 23.5 million Americans were said to have needed specialized treatment for substance abuse, according to a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration national survey. Of these 23.5 million, only 2.6 million received treatment -- 11.2%.

Demographically speaking, 20-59 year-old white alcoholics go to residential rehab. And we're not talking about celebrities who taut spa-like vacation experiences or prohibitively expensive options. Elite rehab facilities aside, publicly funded residential rehab facilities show eye-opening data, from the National Institute on Drug Abuse:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


People who opt for rehab are alcoholics, predominately white and range across all ages. Marijuana users, too, represent a large portion of rehab pursuers, unsurprising considering the legalization battle and rise of medical marijuana prescriptions.

The alarming stat to me was that on opiates, or prescription painkillers. Only 5.9% of drug-related admissions in 2009 were opiate based, staggering considering the upswing in prescription drug abuse. Crack, stimulant (methamphetamine) and heroin all appeared in higher check-in percentages. Have we not yet realized that prescription drug abuse is a problem, or are those under the influence of opiates unlikely to elect for treatment? Perhaps, psychologically, it's easy to use chronic pain (real or imagined) as a crutch, whereas alcohol abuse is increasingly more difficult to forgive.

About Cassie Rodenberg

I write, I listen, I research, I tell stories. Mostly just listen. I don't think we listen without judgment enough. I explore marginalized things we like to ignore. Addiction and mental illness is The White Noise behind many lives -- simply what Is. Peripherals: I write on culture, poverty, addiction and mental illness in New York City, recovering from stints as a chemist and interactive TV producer. During the day, I teach science in South Bronx public school.

More by Cassie Rodenberg

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe