Chelyabinsk Meteor: Dust Grains Reveal How It Played Bumper Car before Hitting Earth

The Chelyabinsk meteor entered the atmosphere over Russia on February 15, 2013. It exploded with a half a megaton of energy, generating a shock wave that blew down walls and injured over 1,000 people.

Nicholas St. Fleur

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Chelyabinsk meteor entered the atmosphere over Russia on February 15, 2013. It exploded with a half a megaton of energy, generating a shock wave that blew down walls and injured over 1,000 people. The meteor ended up largely destroyed in the airburst. Samples of the meteorite, however, survived, such as the one pictured above. "You can think of it as Christmas in meteor-astronomy land," physicist Mark Boslough said in a press conference at the American Geophysical Union meeting on December 9, directly quoting his colleague physicist Peter Brown. The event provides data to answer long-standing questions about solar system processes in the last 4.5 billion years.

Scientists immediately deduced that the small asteroid had previously collided with other objects prior to making its way to Earth. The previous impact events weakened the meteorite, making it more susceptible to blowing up as an air burst. “Had the object been a little bit larger, and a little bit stronger, it may have pierced the entire atmosphere and produced an impact crater at the surface,” says physicist Davis A. Kring, the senior staff scientist at the Universities Space Research Association’s Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston.

Within the meteorite (the whiter portion of the rock) are round grains called chondrules, which were once molten droplets in the solar nebula, before the planets formed. As the solar system coalesced, dust melted to form those droplets, which then solidified to become chondrules. By studying the different marks in the meteorite, researchers concluded that two or three different impact events had taken place prior to the one in February, the first occurring 4.42 billion years ago. Rock samples related to the Chelyabinsk meteorite showed the parent asteroid was bombarded by a lot of other impact events from about 4.3 to 3.8 billion years ago, followed by a period of quiet in collisional activity, and then an increase in collisions again about two billion years ago.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A collision the size of the Chelyabinsk occurs on average every 10 to 100 years, Kring says. “A mass extinction size impact even occurs on average once per 100 million years.” That doesn’t mean, however, that we should wait tens of million years to figure out how to handle the event. “We don’t just ignore rare diseases,” Kring said in the conference. “We try to find a cure. We should do the same thing with rare events” like asteroid impacts.

—Julianne Chiaet

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe