Which came first, the flower or the bee ? Flowering plants (angiosperms) evolved to attract insects some 99.6 million to 65.5 million years ago, about the same time as the bugs that were pollinating them.
WENYING WU
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Which came first, the flower or the bee? Flowering plants (angiosperms) evolved to attract insects some 99.6 million to 65.5 million years ago, about the same time as the bugs that were pollinating them. But a new paper, published online Thursday in Science, proposes that one ancient fly was spreading plant pollen some 160 million years ago—way before there were any flamboyant blossoms.
Extinct members of the scorpion fly family had an impressive protrusion on their heads that may have been specially adapted to harvest nectar from gymnosperms, such as ferns and pines. The authors of the paper analyzed 11 species of ancient scorpion flies. They found that among all these species the fly's head had an approximately 10-millimeter-long proboscis, which researchers propose was used as a straw for sipping nectar from these flowerless plants.
The fossil specimen pictured here, a Lichnomesopsyche gloriae, was from the late middle Jurassic and found in northeastern China. It is now housed at the Capital Normal University in Beijing.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
