Extinct Freshwater Sharks That Spawned in Saltwater Had Been Mistaken for Separate Species

In 1967 the fossilized remains of a strange new shark species were discovered in Will County, Ill., an area known for its marine fossils dating back more than 300 million years.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In 1967 the fossilized remains of a strange new shark species were discovered in Will County, Ill., an area known for its marine fossils dating back more than 300 million years. The shark had an “enormously elongated” snout, according to the paper that first described the species, Bandringa rayi. Several years later, a similar-looking shark was found nearby and christened B. herdinae, a related but different species.

In a new study, published on January 7 in the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, however, researchers have reanalyzed all available specimens of these sharks and determined that they are in fact a single species. The confusion arose in part due to this shark’s unusual trait: adults lived in freshwater swamps but migrated to nearby marine waters to spawn.

These different environments—freshwater and saltwater—resulted in markedly different preservations of the adult and juvenile sharks, says Lauren Sallan, lead author of the paper and assistant professor at the University of Michigan Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. “In the marine fauna you only find soft tissue,” she says. However, in the freshwater sites “you only find skeletal tissue.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the more acidic marine settings the soft tissue is preserved but the skeleton is not. “They’re a bit like peat bog mummies from the U.K.,” Sallan says. “In those mummies all the bones are melted away because the acidity that preserves them, preserves the soft tissue, actually destroys the bone.”

The researchers analyzed eleven different categories of body structures in the fossils, including their long snouts. They found nothing to indicate that B. rayi and B. herdinae were separate species, suggesting that the perceived differences were entirely due to the differences in preservation.

Sallan says that not only is this finding important for the taxonomic study of sharks, but it is also the only known example of a shark that lived in freshwater but spawned in saltwater. They believe the sharks used their long snouts for finding fish to eat, using a network of electroreceptors in much the same way some paddlefish do today.

—Geoffrey Giller

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe