New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Hummingbirds’ Iridescent Feathers Are Still a Bit of a Mystery

Scientists still don’t know the full purpose of this changeable biological trait

Male Anna's hummingbird.

Male Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna) with iridescent face and throat, or gorget, feathers. 

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What looks like an elaborate sequined mask on this male hummingbird could disappear the second he tilts his head. The throat and face feathers are iridescent—depending on the viewing angle, the plumage might flash brilliant or mundane hues. In this species, called Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), only males have an iridescent face and neck. The male Anna’s hummingbird courts mates by sitting absolutely still and singing his heart out to a potential companion. By freezing in place, he guarantees she sees his magenta face coloring.

Researchers are still investigating the purpose of the kaleidoscopic coloring. Iridescence appears in birds, beetles, spiders, and more. Some biologists think that glittering might bolster an animal’s attempt at getting noticed by potential mates, for example. And some organisms can control the precise angles at which they display their iridescent features, indicating that they use their colors to communicate. But such communication strategies have to be reliable and consistent, a research team at the University of Melbourne in Australia pointed out in a recent paper in Trends in Ecology & Evolution. A color that shifts with the tiniest movement of its viewer or owner seems like the opposite of “dependable.”

The group concluded that disco ball-like body parts probably come with other physical or behavioral features that ensure the message gets across. Such iridescence-based communications tactics might be useful for humans, too, said study co-author Devi Stuart-Fox in a University of Melbourne press release. “Understanding how animals reliably use and produce these shifting signals can help the development of bio-inspired iridescent materials designed for human observers,” she noted.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Science in Images

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe