Honey Sticks It To Wounds

Low moisture content and chemicals in honey make it a possible antiseptic and wound treatment. Cynthia Graber reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


You’re chopping vegetables in the kitchen, and the knife slips.  Suddenly blood is dripping from a gash in your hand.  You search for antibiotic ointment but don’t have any.  But there may be some in the kitchen cupboard—honey.  Scientists recently published a review of honey in the International Journal of Clinical Practice.  They examined 18 studies from the past 60 years, and found overwhelming evidence that honey can help speed up healing and prevent infection.

Actually, honey’s been used to treat wounds for thousands of years.  But it fell out of favor in the 1940s when antibiotics came on the scene.  Today, though, people are worried about antibiotic resistance and are also looking to natural remedies.  Honey works because of a number of properties that inhibit bacterial growth.  There’s its low moisture content.  And as the glucose in honey breaks down in air, it naturally forms hydrogen peroxide, an antiseptic agent.  Scientists say that the research suggests that honey might be particularly useful when a wound becomes infected or fails to close or heal after surgery. Honey was even shown to reduce amputation rates among diabetes patients suffering from open, infected sores.

—Cynthia Graber

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe