Gas Giants Make Graphite But Stars Make Diamonds

Gas Giant planets probably have atmosphere full of pencil lead. But white dwarf stars may be diamond factories. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


July 27, 2007  Gas Giants Make Graphite But Stars Make Diamonds

This just in: diamonds are not likely to form in the atmosphere of gas giants…planets such as Uranus and Neptune.

Now, if I know you, you probably *never* thought to look for diamonds in the outer reaches of our solar system. But that’s what physicists were recently contemplating. In the carbon-rich atmospheres of these giant planets, they figured diamonds might just rain from the sky. Or at least crystallize there.

But in an upcoming issue of the journal Physical Review Letters, physicists from Amsterdam in the Netherlands say: no way. According to their calculations, the temperatures and pressures present in and around planets like Uranus would be more suitable for generating graphite. Yes, the atmosphere around our outermost planets could be filled with pencil lead.

But wait…there’s more. The same scientists contend that white dwarves…which are the end-stage of the great majority of stars in our galaxy…are veritable diamond factories. Conditions there are perfectly suitable for transforming carbon atoms into sparkling gems. Indeed, three years ago astronomers spotted a white dwarf whose core appeared to be a diamond 2500 miles wide.  Now that would make an engagement ring that would break your finger, and your bank account.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe