Simply Opening Windows Reduces Risk of TB Transmission In Hospital ER

Natural ventilation turns the air over more efficiently than mechanical air freshening systems, reducing risk of TB transmission.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.



Contrary to popular wisdom, a new study finds that if you want to avoid getting sick you should open a window. At least if you don’t want to catch TB in a hospital in Lima, Peru. Researchers from the Imperial College London were looking for ways to limit the spread of tuberculosis in the Peruvian situation. One major site of transmission is apparently the hospital waiting room, where infected individuals come to be treated. In close quarters, one person with TB can infect many others, by sneezing, coughing, even speaking. To curb the contagion, the researchers prescribed ventilation. And the best ventilation, they find, is the simplest—opening the doors and windows. Such natural ventilation really keeps things moving, allowing the air in the room to be replaced by fresh air an average of 28 times an hour. Even mechanical systems specifically designed to exchange the air in isolation wards only achieve 12 air changes an hour, and that’s when they’re working at maximum capacity, which is not often the case. The study is good news for hospitals that can’t afford sophisticated mechanical ventilation systems. And it’s a real shot in the arm for people who’ve always said that a little fresh air is good for you.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe