Body Clock Doubles As Dinner Bell

Researchers working with mice found that the brain has an internal clock that wakes the animal to make sure it eats. Karen Hopkin reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

I had a roommate who couldn’t sleep unless it was pitch dark, so she wore a face mask to bed. But she’d gotten it from an airline, so one of the eye patches had a little sticker on it that said, “Wake me for meals.” Now a new study from Harvard Medical school suggests that she needn’t have bothered with the sticker. Because scientists there have found that the brain has a special “meal clock” that keeps animals from snoozing when there’s food to be had. The results appear in the May 23 issue of Science.

As you probably know, the body has a master clock that tells us when to sleep and wake. That timepiece takes cues from the sun to keep us in synch with the rest of the world. Working with mice, the Harvard scientists located a second clock, one that responds to food rather than sunlight. So if there’s a cheese shortage when the mouse makes his midnight run, he can reset his alarm to see if the snack bar is better stocked at noon. The finding is good news for travelers, who may be able to reset their own body clocks, thereby adjusting more quickly to the local time zone and minimizing jet lag, by simply not eating anything on the plane. Which is probably sound advice no matter how long your flight

.—Karen Hopkin

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe