Some Bacteria Dine On Antibiotics

Some bacteria are more than resistant to various antibiotics--they can actually survive eating nothing BUT antibiotics. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Podcast Transcript: Bacteria are amazingly adaptable. They live in hot springs, in the Dead Sea and, of course, inside people, where they can dish up some truly nasty diseases.  Over the years many of these crafty critters have figured out how to dodge the antibiotics we use to kill them, usually by chewing the drugs up and spitting ‘em out. Now researchers from Harvard Medical School have figured out that in the soil, there are bacteria that are not only immune to our antibiotics—they eat antibiotics for breakfast. The discovery appears in the April 4 issue of Science.
 
The scientists collected a diverse sample of soils from cornfields, forests, swamps, even the Boston Public Garden. From this dirt they isolated hundreds of different bacteria that could grow in a broth that contained nothing to eat, except a great big helping of antibiotics. The fact that the ground is teeming with drug-munching bugs might seem surprising. But remember, most of our antibiotics come from organisms that live in the dirt, like molds and even other bacteria. With that kind of exposure, some bugs are bound to figure out how to turn these potential toxins into a tasty snack. The danger for us is that they’ll share these recipes with their disease-causing pals.

—Karen Hopkin

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe