Double Suicide Risk For Vets

Military veterans are twice as likely as non-vets to take their own lives, with those having health problems at the highest risk. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


June 12, 2007  Double Sucide Risk For Vets

Veterans, especially wounded ones, also carry psychic scars of their war experiences.  Those mental wounds can also sometimes be fatal.  A new study finds that former military personnel are twice as likely to commit suicide as are people who never served.  The study appears in the July issue of the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.  Those at the highest risk were veterans who were sidelined from home, work or leisure activities because of health issues.  So doctors, friends and family members should be extra alert for signs of suicidal intentions in soldiers returning from Afghanistan and Iraq, especially wounded ones. 

The researchers followed over 300,000 veterans for 12 years.  Some of the vets in the study went all the way back to World War I, with the more recent vets having served in the first Iraq War in the early ‘90s.  Some quirky findings in the study.  Overweight veterans were less likely to take their own lives than men of normal weight.    But vets who were white, older, better educated and never married were more likely to take their own lives than were people in the general population.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe